航班临时管制对飞机污染物排放影响效应研究

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.08.011

生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1276-1286.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.08.011

• 研究论文【环境科学】 • 上一篇下一篇

航班临时管制对飞机污染物排放影响效应研究

马思萌¹^,²(), 付千千¹^,², 韩博¹^,²^,^*(), 梁珊珊², 张晨³, 赵静波¹^,², 毛洪钧⁴, 于剑²^,⁵

¹ 中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院，天津 300300
² 中国民航大学中国民航环境与可持续发展研究中心，天津 300300
³ 中国民航科学技术研究院，北京 100028
⁴ 南开大学环境科学与工程学院/天津市城市交通污染防治研究重点实验室，天津 300350
⁵ 中国民航管理干部学院，北京 100102

收稿日期:2025-10-05 修回日期:2026-02-06 接受日期:2026-04-11 出版日期:2026-08-18 发布日期:2026-08-17
通讯作者: * E-mail: bhan@cauc.edu.cn
作者简介:马思萌（1990年生），女，讲师，博士，从事航空交通环境研究。E-mail: smma@cauc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U2133206);国家自然科学基金项目(42305192);生态环境部机动车污染控制与模拟重点实验室开放基金资助项目(VECS2024K06)

Research on the Impact of Airport Emergencies on Aircraft Pollutant Emissions

Ma Simeng¹^,²(), Fu Qianqian¹^,², Han Bo¹^,²^,^*(), Liang Shanshan², Zhang Chen³, Zhao Jingbo¹^,², Mao Hongjun⁴, Yu Jian²^,⁵

¹ School of Transportation Science and Engineering of Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, P. R. China
² Research Centre for Environment and Sustainable Development of Civil Aviation of China, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, P. R. China
³ China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology, Beijing 100028, P. R. China
⁴ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research/College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, P. R. China
⁵ Civil Aviation Management Institute of China, Beijing 100102, P. R. China

Received:2025-10-05 Revised:2026-02-06 Accepted:2026-04-11 Online:2026-08-18 Published:2026-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】针对机场突发事件导致航班临时管制后飞机污染物排放变化规律及影响效应尚不明确的问题，研究航班临时管制对飞机污染物排放总量及其时空分布特征的影响，为机场突发事件环境影响评估与应急管理提供依据。【方法】以天津滨海国际机场为例，基于真实飞行航迹，采用混合机器学习模型，结合国际民航组织（International Civil Aviation Organization，ICAO）标准排放数据库，构建航班临时管制时段及前后飞机起降阶段高精度动态排放清单，分析污染物排放时空分布特征。【结果】航班临时管制时段（C2）机场区域飞机主要污染物排放日均值较事件发生前期（C1）和后期（C3）分别降低23.1%和27.4%。受航班临时管制影响，污染物排放时空特征发生显著变化。水平分布显示，C2时段污染物排放在跑道区域降低，在滑行道和停机坪区域升高。其中，NO_x跑道区域排放量日均值为22.9 g·d⁻¹，较C1下降20.2%；CO和HC在滑行道、停机坪区域排放量日均值分别为11.24 g·d⁻¹和0.87 g·d⁻¹，较C1分别增加21.7%和18.1%。垂直分布显示，C2时段污染物日均排放量在500 m以上中高空区域增加，在0－500 m近地面区域降低；相较于C1，NO_x中高空区域排放占比增加20.2%，HC和CO近地面区域排放占比分别降低27.2%和28.3%。【结论】突发事件对机场及周边污染物排放影响显著。分析航班临时管制对飞机运行污染物排放的影响效应，可为机场科学应对突发情况、有效管控提供支撑。

关键词: 机场排放, 机器学习, 高精度排放清单, 水平分布特征, 垂直分布特征

Abstract:

[Objective] Airport emergency events can significantly disturb normal flight operations and lead to temporary flight control measures, which may further affect aircraft pollutant emissions and the surrounding air quality of airports. As an important source of air pollutants during airport operations, aircraft emissions are closely associated with flight activity levels, operational procedures, and aircraft movement characteristics. Under normal operating conditions, aircraft emission characteristics are relatively stable; however, emergency events may cause temporary changes in aircraft operation patterns, resulting in variations in pollutant emission levels and spatial distribution characteristics. With the continuous growth of air transportation activities, aircraft emissions during airport operations have attracted increasing attention due to their potential influence on local atmospheric environments. Therefore, evaluating emission changes under emergency scenarios is necessary for improving the understanding of airport environmental impacts.

Although aircraft emission inventories have been widely applied to evaluate the environmental impacts of airport operations, most studies focus on normal operational scenarios, while the emission characteristics under temporary flight control conditions remain insufficiently investigated. In particular, the influence of temporary flight control on aircraft pollutant emission levels and spatial distribution characteristics before, during, and after emergency events requires further analysis. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of temporary flight control caused by airport emergency events on aircraft pollutant emissions. The changes in total emissions and temporal-spatial distribution characteristics of aircraft pollutants during different operational periods are analyzed to provide a basis for airport environmental impact assessment and emergency management. [Methods] Tianjin Binhai International Airport was selected as the study area. Based on actual flight trajectory data, a hybrid machine learning model was applied to characterize aircraft fuel consumption during take-off and landing operations. The model was used to establish the relationship between flight trajectory characteristics and fuel flow, providing the basis for estimating aircraft fuel consumption under actual operating conditions. The estimated fuel consumption was combined with the standard emission database provided by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to calculate aircraft pollutant emissions. A high-resolution dynamic emission inventory was constructed for the temporary flight control period and the periods before and after the emergency event. The study period was divided into three stages: the period before the event (C1), the temporary flight control period (C2), and the period after the event (C3). The emission characteristics of aircraft pollutants during different periods were compared to evaluate the influence of temporary flight control. Based on the constructed dynamic emission inventory, the temporal-spatial distribution characteristics of major aircraft pollutants were analyzed. The horizontal distribution characteristics were evaluated according to different airport functional areas, including runway areas, taxiways, and aprons. The vertical distribution characteristics were analyzed according to different altitude ranges, including the middle and high altitude region above 500 m and the near-ground region from 0 to 500 m. The constructed emission inventory provides a detailed description of aircraft pollutant emissions under different operational conditions and allows comparison of emission variations among different stages of emergency events. This approach enables the identification of emission changes caused by temporary flight control and supports quantitative evaluation of airport emergency impacts. [Results] The results show that temporary flight control significantly affected aircraft pollutant emissions in the airport area. During the temporary flight control period (C2), the daily average emissions of major aircraft pollutants decreased by 23.1% and 27.4% compared with the period before the event (C1) and the period after the event (C3), respectively. The reduction in total emissions was mainly related to the decrease in aircraft operating activities caused by temporary flight control. In addition to changes in total emission levels, temporary flight control also significantly changed the temporal-spatial distribution characteristics of aircraft pollutants. From the perspective of horizontal distribution, pollutant emissions decreased in runway areas but increased in taxiway and apron areas during C2. The daily average NOx emission in runway areas was 22.9 g·d⁻¹, which decreased by 20.2% compared with C1. In contrast, the daily average emissions of CO and HC in taxiway and apron areas were 11.24 g·d⁻¹ and 0.87 g·d⁻¹, respectively, representing increases of 21.7% and 18.1% compared with C1. The changes in different airport functional areas were mainly associated with variations in aircraft operation processes during temporary flight control. The reduction of flight activities resulted in decreased emissions in areas related to aircraft take-off and landing operations, while changes in ground operation conditions contributed to increased emissions in taxiway and apron areas. The vertical distribution characteristics of pollutant emissions also changed significantly during the temporary flight control period. The daily average emissions of pollutants increased in the middle and high altitude region above 500 m but decreased in the near-ground region from 0 to 500 m. Compared with C1, the proportion of NO_x emissions in the middle and high altitude region increased by 20.2% during C2. Meanwhile, the proportions of HC and CO emissions in the near-ground region decreased by 27.2% and 28.3%, respectively. These results indicate that temporary flight control not only affects the total amount of aircraft pollutant emissions but also changes the spatial distribution characteristics of pollutants at different airport areas and altitude levels. [Conclusion] The results demonstrate that airport emergency events have significant impacts on aircraft pollutant emissions and their spatial distribution characteristics. Temporary flight control caused by emergency events changes aircraft operating conditions, resulting in variations in both total pollutant emissions and their distribution patterns in horizontal and vertical dimensions. The assessment of aircraft pollutant emissions under emergency scenarios should consider the changes caused by temporary flight control. Systematic analysis of the influence of temporary flight control on aircraft operating pollutant emissions can provide support for airport emergency response and effective emission control. The dynamic emission assessment method applied in this study can provide a reference for evaluating the environmental impacts of airport emergency events. The findings also emphasize the necessity of incorporating temporary operational changes into airport emission assessments.

Key words: airport emissions, machine learning, high-precision emission inventory, horizontal distribution characteristics, vertical distribution characteristics

中图分类号:

马思萌, 付千千, 韩博, 梁珊珊, 张晨, 赵静波, 毛洪钧, 于剑. 航班临时管制对飞机污染物排放影响效应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(8): 1276-1286.

Ma Simeng, Fu Qianqian, Han Bo, Liang Shanshan, Zhang Chen, Zhao Jingbo, Mao Hongjun, Yu Jian. Research on the Impact of Airport Emergencies on Aircraft Pollutant Emissions[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1276-1286.

图/表 7

图1 研究区域区位图该图基于审图号为GS（2024）1158号的标准地图制作；底图边界无修改。下同

Figure 1 The location map of the research area

图2 主要气象要素时间变化趋势

Figure 2 Temporal variation characteristics of major meteorological elements

图3 航班临时管制时段及前后燃油消耗量变化特征

Figure 3 Variation of daily fuel consumption around the emergency period

图4 天津机场燃油消耗量的时间变化情况

Figure 4 The temporal variation of fuel consumption at Tianjin Binhai International Airport

图5 天津机场航班临时管制时段及其前后污染物排放变化特征

Figure 5 Characteristics of pollutant emission changes during and around the emergency period at Tianjin Binhai International Airport

图6 天津机场航班临时管制时段及其前后污染物排放水平分布特征

Figure 6 Horizontal distribution of pollutant emissions during and around the emergency period at Tianjin Binhai International Airport

图7 天津机场航班临时管制时段及其前后污染物排放垂直分布特征

Figure 7 Vertical distribution characteristics of pollutant emissions during and around the emergency period at Tianjin Binhai International Airport

参考文献 38

[1]	Altringer L, Navin J, Begier M J, et al., 2021. Estimating wildlife strike costs at US airports: A machine learning approach[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97: 102907. DOI URL
[2]	Cameron M A, Jacobson M Z, Barrett R H, et al., 2017. An intercomparative study of the effects of aircraft emissions on surface air quality[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122: 8325-8344. DOI URL
[3]	Cao F, Tang T Q, Gao Y Q, et al., 2023. Calculation and analysis of new taxiing methods on aircraft fuel consumption and pollutant emissions[J]. Energy, 277: 127618. DOI URL
[4]	Chen Z S, Lam J S L, Xiao Z, et al., 2024. Prediction of harbor vessel emissions based on machine learning approach[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 131: 104214. DOI URL
[5]	Eurocontrol, 2016. EUROCONTROL method for estimating aviation fuel burnt and emissions in the framework of the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook[Z]. Brussels: European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, 2016-06-29.
[6]	European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 2023. ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank [Z]. Cologne: European Union Aviation Safety Agency.
[7]	Fuglestvedt J S, Shine K P, Bernsten T, et al., 2010. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 44(37): 4648-4677. DOI URL
[8]	Guan Y N, Chen G Y, Cheng Z J, et al., 2017. Air pollutant emissions from straw open burning: A case study in Tianjin[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 171: 155-164. DOI URL
[9]	Han B, Yao T W, Li G J, et al., 2022. Marginal reduction in surface NO₂ attributable to airport shutdown: A machine learning regression-based approach[J]. Environmental Research, 214: 114117. DOI URL
[10]	International Civil Aviation Organization, 2008. ICAO International standards and recommended practices, Environmental protection, Annex 16 to the Convention on International Aviation, Volume II, Aircraft Engine Emissions[Z]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization.
[11]	International Civil Aviation Organization, 2015. ICAO engine exhaust emissions data bank[R]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization.
[12]	Klenner J, Muri H, Stroman A H, 2022. High-resolution modeling of aviation emissions in Norway[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109: 103379. DOI URL
[13]	Li J, Yang H T, Liu Y N, et al., 2020. Aircraft emission inventory and characteristics of the airport cluster in the Guangdong-Hong-Kong-Macao greater bay area China[J]. Atmosphere, 11(4): 323. DOI URL
[14]	Liu Z, Deng Z, Steven J, et al., 2022. Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(4): 217-219.
[15]	Ma S M, Lin S Z, Han B, et al., 2025. Revealing considerable emissions reduction potential in flight operations: A real-time emission perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 143: 104745. DOI URL
[16]	Masiol M, Harrison R M, 2014. Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 95: 409-455. DOI PMID
[17]	Mokalled T, Le C S, Badaro N, et al., 2018. Identifying the impact of Beirut Airport's activities on local air quality-Part I: Emissions inventory of NO₂ and VOCs[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 187: 435-444. DOI URL
[18]	Munir S, Luo Z, Dixon T, et al., 2022. The impact of smart traffic interventions on roadside air quality employing machine learning approaches[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 110: 103408. DOI URL
[19]	Phoenix D, Khodayari A, Wuebbles D, et al., 2019. Aviation impact on air quality present day and mid-century simulated in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 196: 125-132. DOI
[20]	Stettler M E J, Boies A M, Petzold A, et al., 2013. Global civil aviation black carbon emissions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(18): 10397-10404.
[21]	Shi K, Weng J X, 2022. Impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic on merchant ship activity and pollution emissions in Shanghai port waters[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 790: 148198. DOI URL
[22]	Tokuslu A, 2020. Estimation of aircraft emissions at Georgian international airport[J]. Energy, 206: 118219. DOI URL
[23]	Yin C F, Wu J X, Sun X L, et al., 2024. Road transportation emission prediction and policy formulation: Machine learning model analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135: 104390. DOI URL
[24]	Zhang J R, Zhang S J, Zhang X L, et al., 2022. Developing a high-resolution emission inventory of China’s aviation sector using real-world flight trajectory data[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(9): 5743-5752. DOI URL
[25]	陈文君, 廖一嘉, 周建力, 等, 2022. 机场大气污染物高时间分辨率排放清单计算方法研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 38(4): 217-226.
	Chen W J, Liao Y J, Zhou J L, et al., 2022. Study on calculation method of airport air pollution high temporal resolution emission inventory[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 38(4): 217-226.
[26]	韩博, 黄佳敏, 魏志强, 2016. 民航飞机起飞过程气态污染物排放特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 37(12): 4524-4530.
	Han B, Huang J M, Wei Z Q, 2016. Gaseous emission characterization of civil aviation aircraft during takeoff[J]. Environmental Science, 37(12): 4524-4530. DOI URL
[27]	韩博, 刘雅婷, 谭宏志, 等, 2017. 一次航班飞行全过程大气污染物排放特征[J]. 环境科学学报, 37(12): 4492-4502.
	Han B, Liu Y T, Tan H Z, et al., 2017. Emission characterization of civil aviation aircraft during a whole flight[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 37(12): 4492-4502.
[28]	韩博, 孔魏凯, 姚婷玮, 等, 2020a. 京津冀机场群飞机LTO大气污染物排放清单[J]. 环境科学, 41(3): 1143-1150.
	Han B, Kong W K, Yao T W, et al., 2020a. Air pollutant emission inventory from LTO cycles of aircraft in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei airport group, China[J]. Environmental Science, 41(3): 1143-1150.
[29]	韩博, 何真, 张铎, 等, 2020b. 粤港澳大湾区飞机LTO污染排放因子及排放清单[J]. 中国环境科学, 40(12): 5182-5190.
	Han B, He Z, Zhang D, et al., 2020b. Research on aircraft LTO pollutant emission factors and emission inventory in Guangdong-Hong-Kong Macao Greater Bay Area, China[J]. China Environmental Science, 40(12): 5182-5190.
[30]	李晨旭, 王紫怡, 2025. 机场大气污染物排放时空分布测算方法与特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 45(2): 648-656.
	Li C X, Wang Z Y, 2025. Calculation methods and characteristics of temporal and spatial distribution of airport air pollutant emissions[J]. China Environmental Science, 45(2): 648-656.
[31]	李娜, 魏强, 2015. 飞机QAR数据的空气污染物排放量计算研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 38(1): 159-163.
	Li N, Wei Z Q, 2015. Calculating aircraft pollution emissions based on QAR Data[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(1): 159-163.
[32]	马思萌, 汤慧娟, 郑宸, 等, 2025. 基于运行仿真的机场飞机排放本地化修正模型及应用[J/OL]. 交通运输工程学报, 1-21 [2026-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.027.
	Ma S M, Tang H J, Zheng C, et al., 2025. Localized correction model for airport aircraft emissions based on operational simulation and its application[J/OL]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 1-21 [2026-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.027.
[33]	孙见忠, 左洪福, 刘鹏鹏, 等, 2012. 航空发动机污染物排放量估算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 12(2): 53-61.
	Sun J Z, Zuo H F, Liu P P, et al., 2012. Estimation method of aeroengine pollution emissions[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 12(2): 53-61.
[34]	王瑞宁, 黄成, 任洪娟, 等, 2018. 长三角地区民航飞机起飞着陆LTO循环大气污染物排放清单[J]. 环境科学学报, 38(11): 4472-4479.
	Wang R N, Huang C, Ren H J, et al., 2018. Air pollutant emission inventory from LTO cycles of aircraft in civil aviation airports in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 38(11): 4472-4479.
[35]	徐冉, 郎建垒, 杨孝文, 等, 2016. 首都国际机场飞机排放清单的建立[J]. 中国环境科学, 36(8): 2554-2560.
	Xu R, Lang J L, Yang X W, et al., 2016. Establishment of aircraft emission inventory for Beijing capital international airport[J]. China Environmental Science, 36(8): 2554-2560.
[36]	张田, 田勇, 2023. 中国民航飞机大气污染物和碳排放清单估算[J]. 中国环境科学, 43(10): 5614-5623.
	Zhang T, Tian Y, 2023. Estimation of both air pollutants and carbon emission inventories from civil aircrafts in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 43(10): 5614-5623.
[37]	张耀, 2021. 基于分数阶灰色模型的飞行环境空气质量研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学.
	Zhang Y, 2021. Research on air quality of flight environment based on fractional grey model[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
[38]	周子航, 陆成伟, 谭钦文, 等, 2018. 成都双流国际机场大气污染物排放清单与时空分布特征[J]. 中国环境监测, 34(3): 75-83.
	Zhou Z H, Lu C W, Tan Q W, et al., 2018. Emission inventory and spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of air pollutant in Chengdu Shuangliu international airport[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 34(3): 75-83.

航班临时管制对飞机污染物排放影响效应研究

Research on the Impact of Airport Emergencies on Aircraft Pollutant Emissions

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 38

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄思琦, 李婷苑, 王俊彬, 陈靖扬, 沈劲. 广东沿海地区海陆风对本地臭氧的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(7): 1098-1113.
[2]	周家豪, 张沛, 彭煜文, 钟松雄, 邹建平, 侯冬梅. 基于机器学习识别赣江流域重金属污染主控因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 976-985.
[3]	吴璇, 余佳丽, 陈笔, 娄云剀, 何敏, 苗芃, 杨帆, 唐涛. 基于胁迫-响应关系的赤水河氮磷生态承载力研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 134-146.
[4]	赵文琪, 张佳华, 张鹏, 白林燕, 姚凤梅. 植被物候监测技术与遥感反演方法研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1473-1482.
[5]	孟洁, 朱星宇, 徐明月, 荣凌云, 吴川福, 汪群慧. 腐熟牛粪沼渣对模拟含氨臭气的去除效能及建模分析研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 922-930.
[6]	王薇, 夏宇轩. 基于遥感技术和机器学习的城市街区PM_2.5空间分布特征研究——以合肥市滨湖新区为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1426-1437.
[7]	杨可明, 彭里顺, 张燕海, 谷新茹, 陈新阳, 江克贵. 淮北矿区多种类型植被地上生物量反演研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(7): 1027-1035.
[8]	文妮, 王重洋, 陈星达, 陈水森, 周霞, 于国荣. 基于机器学习模型的沿海城市河网水系氨氮质量浓度高分辨率遥感估算[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(11): 1737-1747.
[9]	王雪梅, 杨雪峰, 赵枫, 安柏耸, 黄晓宇. 基于机器学习算法的干旱区绿洲地上生物量估算[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1007-1015.
[10]	姜鹏, 秦美欧, 李荣平, 孟莹, 杨霏云, 温日红, 孙沛, 方缘. 中国典型生态系统GPP的季节变异及其影响要素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 643-651.