Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 368-378.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.03.005
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Guoqiang(), CHEN Lixin, WANG Yafei, DUAN Wenbiao*(
), WANG Zhizhen
Received:
2023-10-16
Online:
2024-03-18
Published:
2024-05-08
Contact:
DUAN Wenbiao
通讯作者:
段文标
作者简介:
唐国强(2000年生),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail: 1219475932@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
TANG Guoqiang, CHEN Lixin, WANG Yafei, DUAN Wenbiao, WANG Zhizhen. The Population Structure and Dynamic Characteristics of Korean Pine at Different Succession Stages after Harvesting[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(3): 368-378.
唐国强, 陈立新, 王亚飞, 段文标, 王郅臻. 采伐后各演替阶段红松种群结构和动态特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(3): 368-378.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.03.005
Figure 1 Quantitative characteristics of population composition in pioneer community (a), intermediate community (b), stabilization community (c) and climax community (d) plots
不同演替 阶段群落 | 龄级 | 全体乔木 | 红松 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ax | ax | lnlx | qx | ex | kx | Ax | ax | lnlx | qx | ex | kx | |||
先锋群落 | Ⅰ | 1156 | 1160 | 6.908 | 0.246 | 2.056 | 0.282 | 328 | 344 | 6.908 | 0.477 | 1.160 | 0.648 | |
Ⅱ | 522 | 875 | 6.626 | 0.326 | 1.563 | 0.394 | 6 | 180 | 6.260 | 0.911 | 0.761 | 2.420 | ||
Ⅲ | 256 | 590 | 6.232 | 0.483 | 1.076 | 0.660 | 0 | 16 | 3.840 | 0.250 | 2.432 | 0.288 | ||
Ⅳ | 67 | 305 | 5.572 | 0.934 | 0.615 | 2.725 | 0 | 12 | 3.552 | 0.250 | 2.076 | 0.288 | ||
Ⅴ | 17 | 20 | 2.847 | 0.250 | 1.250 | 0.288 | 0 | 9 | 3.264 | 0.444 | 1.601 | 0.588 | ||
Ⅵ | 17 | 15 | 2.560 | 0 | 5 | 2.677 | 0.400 | 1.482 | 0.511 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 2.166 | 0.363 | 1.137 | 0.451 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 1 | 1.715 | |||||||||||
中期群落 | Ⅰ | 333 | 329 | 8.609 | 0.185 | 2.719 | 0.205 | 139 | 151 | 6.908 | 0.305 | 1.808 | 0.363 | |
Ⅱ | 328 | 268 | 8.404 | 0.228 | 2.224 | 0.258 | 11 | 105 | 6.544 | 0.438 | 1.380 | 0.576 | ||
Ⅲ | 228 | 207 | 8.146 | 0.295 | 1.732 | 0.349 | 6 | 59 | 5.968 | 0.780 | 1.067 | 1.513 | ||
Ⅳ | 161 | 146 | 7.797 | 0.418 | 1.247 | 0.541 | 0 | 13 | 4.455 | 0.231 | 2.072 | 0.262 | ||
Ⅴ | 67 | 85 | 7.256 | 0.718 | 0.782 | 1.265 | 0 | 10 | 4.193 | 0.400 | 1.544 | 0.511 | ||
Ⅵ | 28 | 24 | 5.991 | 0 | 6 | 3.682 | 0.500 | 1.240 | 0.693 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 2.989 | 0.521 | 0.979 | 0.735 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 1 | 2.254 | |||||||||||
稳定群落 | Ⅰ | 283 | 288 | 8.639 | 0.337 | 2.177 | 0.411 | 22 | 31 | 6.908 | 0.065 | 4.057 | 0.067 | |
Ⅱ | 128 | 191 | 8.228 | 0.508 | 2.029 | 0.709 | 0 | 29 | 6.841 | 0.069 | 3.303 | 0.071 | ||
Ⅲ | 89 | 94 | 7.519 | 0.032 | 2.606 | 0.032 | 17 | 27 | 6.770 | 0.296 | 2.510 | 0.351 | ||
Ⅳ | 89 | 91 | 7.487 | 0.275 | 1.676 | 0.321 | 11 | 19 | 6.418 | 0.211 | 2.357 | 0.236 | ||
Ⅴ | 33 | 66 | 7.166 | 0.379 | 1.121 | 0.476 | 11 | 15 | 6.182 | 0.400 | 1.852 | 0.511 | ||
Ⅵ | 39 | 41 | 6.690 | 6 | 9 | 5.671 | 0.222 | 1.753 | 0.251 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 7 | 5.420 | 0.389 | 1.111 | 0.493 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 6 | 4 | 4.927 | |||||||||||
顶极群落 | Ⅰ | 161 | 168 | 8.664 | 0.250 | 2.875 | 0.288 | 6 | 42 | 6.908 | 0.071 | 4.899 | 0.074 | |
Ⅱ | 94 | 126 | 8.377 | 0.333 | 2.667 | 0.405 | 28 | 39 | 6.834 | 0.103 | 4.238 | 0.108 | ||
Ⅲ | 78 | 84 | 7.971 | 0.048 | 2.750 | 0.049 | 0 | 35 | 6.725 | 0.057 | 3.665 | 0.059 | ||
Ⅳ | 78 | 80 | 7.922 | 0.213 | 1.863 | 0.239 | 22 | 33 | 6.667 | 0.152 | 2.857 | 0.164 | ||
Ⅴ | 61 | 63 | 7.684 | 0.270 | 1.230 | 0.314 | 17 | 28 | 6.502 | 0.107 | 2.277 | 0.113 | ||
Ⅵ | 44 | 46 | 7.369 | 33 | 25 | 6.389 | 0.440 | 1.491 | 0.580 | |||||
Ⅶ | 17 | 14 | 5.809 | 0.231 | 1.269 | 0.262 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 17 | 10 | 5.547 |
Table 2 Static life table of total arbors and Pinus koraiensis populations in different communities at different succession stages
不同演替 阶段群落 | 龄级 | 全体乔木 | 红松 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ax | ax | lnlx | qx | ex | kx | Ax | ax | lnlx | qx | ex | kx | |||
先锋群落 | Ⅰ | 1156 | 1160 | 6.908 | 0.246 | 2.056 | 0.282 | 328 | 344 | 6.908 | 0.477 | 1.160 | 0.648 | |
Ⅱ | 522 | 875 | 6.626 | 0.326 | 1.563 | 0.394 | 6 | 180 | 6.260 | 0.911 | 0.761 | 2.420 | ||
Ⅲ | 256 | 590 | 6.232 | 0.483 | 1.076 | 0.660 | 0 | 16 | 3.840 | 0.250 | 2.432 | 0.288 | ||
Ⅳ | 67 | 305 | 5.572 | 0.934 | 0.615 | 2.725 | 0 | 12 | 3.552 | 0.250 | 2.076 | 0.288 | ||
Ⅴ | 17 | 20 | 2.847 | 0.250 | 1.250 | 0.288 | 0 | 9 | 3.264 | 0.444 | 1.601 | 0.588 | ||
Ⅵ | 17 | 15 | 2.560 | 0 | 5 | 2.677 | 0.400 | 1.482 | 0.511 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 2.166 | 0.363 | 1.137 | 0.451 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 1 | 1.715 | |||||||||||
中期群落 | Ⅰ | 333 | 329 | 8.609 | 0.185 | 2.719 | 0.205 | 139 | 151 | 6.908 | 0.305 | 1.808 | 0.363 | |
Ⅱ | 328 | 268 | 8.404 | 0.228 | 2.224 | 0.258 | 11 | 105 | 6.544 | 0.438 | 1.380 | 0.576 | ||
Ⅲ | 228 | 207 | 8.146 | 0.295 | 1.732 | 0.349 | 6 | 59 | 5.968 | 0.780 | 1.067 | 1.513 | ||
Ⅳ | 161 | 146 | 7.797 | 0.418 | 1.247 | 0.541 | 0 | 13 | 4.455 | 0.231 | 2.072 | 0.262 | ||
Ⅴ | 67 | 85 | 7.256 | 0.718 | 0.782 | 1.265 | 0 | 10 | 4.193 | 0.400 | 1.544 | 0.511 | ||
Ⅵ | 28 | 24 | 5.991 | 0 | 6 | 3.682 | 0.500 | 1.240 | 0.693 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 2.989 | 0.521 | 0.979 | 0.735 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 1 | 2.254 | |||||||||||
稳定群落 | Ⅰ | 283 | 288 | 8.639 | 0.337 | 2.177 | 0.411 | 22 | 31 | 6.908 | 0.065 | 4.057 | 0.067 | |
Ⅱ | 128 | 191 | 8.228 | 0.508 | 2.029 | 0.709 | 0 | 29 | 6.841 | 0.069 | 3.303 | 0.071 | ||
Ⅲ | 89 | 94 | 7.519 | 0.032 | 2.606 | 0.032 | 17 | 27 | 6.770 | 0.296 | 2.510 | 0.351 | ||
Ⅳ | 89 | 91 | 7.487 | 0.275 | 1.676 | 0.321 | 11 | 19 | 6.418 | 0.211 | 2.357 | 0.236 | ||
Ⅴ | 33 | 66 | 7.166 | 0.379 | 1.121 | 0.476 | 11 | 15 | 6.182 | 0.400 | 1.852 | 0.511 | ||
Ⅵ | 39 | 41 | 6.690 | 6 | 9 | 5.671 | 0.222 | 1.753 | 0.251 | |||||
Ⅶ | 0 | 7 | 5.420 | 0.389 | 1.111 | 0.493 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 6 | 4 | 4.927 | |||||||||||
顶极群落 | Ⅰ | 161 | 168 | 8.664 | 0.250 | 2.875 | 0.288 | 6 | 42 | 6.908 | 0.071 | 4.899 | 0.074 | |
Ⅱ | 94 | 126 | 8.377 | 0.333 | 2.667 | 0.405 | 28 | 39 | 6.834 | 0.103 | 4.238 | 0.108 | ||
Ⅲ | 78 | 84 | 7.971 | 0.048 | 2.750 | 0.049 | 0 | 35 | 6.725 | 0.057 | 3.665 | 0.059 | ||
Ⅳ | 78 | 80 | 7.922 | 0.213 | 1.863 | 0.239 | 22 | 33 | 6.667 | 0.152 | 2.857 | 0.164 | ||
Ⅴ | 61 | 63 | 7.684 | 0.270 | 1.230 | 0.314 | 17 | 28 | 6.502 | 0.107 | 2.277 | 0.113 | ||
Ⅵ | 44 | 46 | 7.369 | 33 | 25 | 6.389 | 0.440 | 1.491 | 0.580 | |||||
Ⅶ | 17 | 14 | 5.809 | 0.231 | 1.269 | 0.262 | ||||||||
Ⅷ | 17 | 10 | 5.547 |
种群 | 不同演替阶段群落 | 拟合结果 | R2 | F | 存活曲线类型 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
全体乔木 | 先锋群落 | y=10.181e−0.217x | 0.832 | 19.868 | Deevey-Ⅱ |
y=8.6202x−0.542 | 0.649 | 7.422 | |||
中期群落 | y=9.6205e−0.066x | 0.841 | 20.924 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=9.1469x−0.163 | 0.655 | 7.516 | |||
稳定群落 | y=8.9994e−0.049x | 0.962 | 99.577 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.8033x−0.135 | 0.931 | 53.282 | |||
顶极群落 | y=8.893e−0.031x | 0.974 | 151.752 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.7671x−0.085 | 0.937 | 58.708 | |||
红松 | 先锋群落 | y=8.1806e−0.193x | 0.966 | 171.839 | Deevey-Ⅱ |
y=8.1749x−0.655 | 0.917 | 66.012 | |||
中期群落 | y=8.827e−0.158x | 0.967 | 176.271 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.4995x−0.508 | 0.824 | 28.013 | |||
稳定群落 | y=7.6004e−0.049x | 0.933 | 85.034 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=7.4528x−0.151 | 0.736 | 16.809 | |||
顶极群落 | y=7.3338e−0.03x | 0.857 | 36.067 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=7.2279x−0.091 | 0.649 | 11.110 |
Table 3 Test models of survival curves of various groups in different communities at different succession stages
种群 | 不同演替阶段群落 | 拟合结果 | R2 | F | 存活曲线类型 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
全体乔木 | 先锋群落 | y=10.181e−0.217x | 0.832 | 19.868 | Deevey-Ⅱ |
y=8.6202x−0.542 | 0.649 | 7.422 | |||
中期群落 | y=9.6205e−0.066x | 0.841 | 20.924 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=9.1469x−0.163 | 0.655 | 7.516 | |||
稳定群落 | y=8.9994e−0.049x | 0.962 | 99.577 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.8033x−0.135 | 0.931 | 53.282 | |||
顶极群落 | y=8.893e−0.031x | 0.974 | 151.752 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.7671x−0.085 | 0.937 | 58.708 | |||
红松 | 先锋群落 | y=8.1806e−0.193x | 0.966 | 171.839 | Deevey-Ⅱ |
y=8.1749x−0.655 | 0.917 | 66.012 | |||
中期群落 | y=8.827e−0.158x | 0.967 | 176.271 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=8.4995x−0.508 | 0.824 | 28.013 | |||
稳定群落 | y=7.6004e−0.049x | 0.933 | 85.034 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=7.4528x−0.151 | 0.736 | 16.809 | |||
顶极群落 | y=7.3338e−0.03x | 0.857 | 36.067 | Deevey-Ⅱ | |
y=7.2279x−0.091 | 0.649 | 11.110 |
指数级 | 全体乔木 | 指数级 | 红松 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
先锋群落 | 中期 群落 | 稳定 群落 | 顶极群落 | 先锋群落 | 中期群落 | 稳定 群落 | 顶极群落 | ||
V1 | 0.246 | 0.185 | 0.337 | 0.250 | V1 | 0.477 | 0.305 | 0.065 | 0.071 |
V2 | 0.326 | 0.228 | 0.508 | 0.333 | V2 | 0.911 | 0.438 | 0.069 | 0.103 |
V3 | 0.483 | 0.295 | 0.032 | 0.048 | V3 | 0.250 | 0.780 | 0.296 | 0.057 |
V4 | 0.934 | 0.418 | 0.275 | 0.213 | V4 | 0.250 | 0.231 | 0.211 | 0.152 |
V5 | 0.250 | 0.718 | 0.379 | 0.270 | V5 | 0.444 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.107 |
V6 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.222 | 0.440 | |||||
V7 | 0.667 | 0.667 | 0.429 | 0.286 | |||||
Vpi | 0.388 | 0.295 | 0.338 | 0.234 | Vpi | 0.603 | 0.432 | 0.197 | 0.148 |
Vpi' | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | Vpi' | 0.075 | 0.054 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Pmax | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.004 | Pmax | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.031 | 0.013 |
Table 4 Dynamic change index of various groups in each stage
指数级 | 全体乔木 | 指数级 | 红松 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
先锋群落 | 中期 群落 | 稳定 群落 | 顶极群落 | 先锋群落 | 中期群落 | 稳定 群落 | 顶极群落 | ||
V1 | 0.246 | 0.185 | 0.337 | 0.250 | V1 | 0.477 | 0.305 | 0.065 | 0.071 |
V2 | 0.326 | 0.228 | 0.508 | 0.333 | V2 | 0.911 | 0.438 | 0.069 | 0.103 |
V3 | 0.483 | 0.295 | 0.032 | 0.048 | V3 | 0.250 | 0.780 | 0.296 | 0.057 |
V4 | 0.934 | 0.418 | 0.275 | 0.213 | V4 | 0.250 | 0.231 | 0.211 | 0.152 |
V5 | 0.250 | 0.718 | 0.379 | 0.270 | V5 | 0.444 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.107 |
V6 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.222 | 0.440 | |||||
V7 | 0.667 | 0.667 | 0.429 | 0.286 | |||||
Vpi | 0.388 | 0.295 | 0.338 | 0.234 | Vpi | 0.603 | 0.432 | 0.197 | 0.148 |
Vpi' | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | Vpi' | 0.075 | 0.054 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Pmax | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.004 | Pmax | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.031 | 0.013 |
不同演替阶段群落 | 龄级 | 全体乔木 | 红松 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ax | M2 | M4 | Ax | M2 | M4 | M6 | |||
先锋群落 | Ⅰ | 1156 | 328 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 522 | 839 | 6 | 167 | |||||
Ⅲ | 256 | 389 | 0 | 3 | |||||
Ⅳ | 67 | 161 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 83 | |||
Ⅴ | 17 | 42 | 215 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
Ⅵ | 17 | 17 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
中期群落 | Ⅰ | 333 | 139 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 328 | 331 | 11 | 75 | |||||
Ⅲ | 228 | 278 | 6 | 8 | |||||
Ⅳ | 161 | 194 | 263 | 0 | 3 | 39 | |||
Ⅴ | 67 | 114 | 196 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |||
Ⅵ | 28 | 47 | 121 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
稳定群落 | Ⅰ | 283 | 22 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 128 | 206 | 0 | 11 | |||||
Ⅲ | 89 | 108 | 17 | 8 | |||||
Ⅳ | 89 | 89 | 147 | 11 | 14 | 13 | |||
Ⅴ | 33 | 61 | 85 | 11 | 11 | 10 | |||
Ⅵ | 39 | 36 | 63 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 11 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | |||||
Ⅷ | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | |||||
顶极群落 | Ⅰ | 161 | 6 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 94 | 128 | 28 | 17 | |||||
Ⅲ | 78 | 86 | 0 | 14 | |||||
Ⅳ | 78 | 78 | 103 | 22 | 11 | 14 | |||
Ⅴ | 61 | 69 | 78 | 17 | 19 | 17 | |||
Ⅵ | 44 | 53 | 65 | 33 | 25 | 18 | 18 | ||
Ⅶ | 17 | 25 | 22 | 19 | |||||
Ⅷ | 17 | 17 | 21 | 18 |
Table 5 Time series prediction of dynamic changes of various groups in each stage
不同演替阶段群落 | 龄级 | 全体乔木 | 红松 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ax | M2 | M4 | Ax | M2 | M4 | M6 | |||
先锋群落 | Ⅰ | 1156 | 328 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 522 | 839 | 6 | 167 | |||||
Ⅲ | 256 | 389 | 0 | 3 | |||||
Ⅳ | 67 | 161 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 83 | |||
Ⅴ | 17 | 42 | 215 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
Ⅵ | 17 | 17 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
中期群落 | Ⅰ | 333 | 139 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 328 | 331 | 11 | 75 | |||||
Ⅲ | 228 | 278 | 6 | 8 | |||||
Ⅳ | 161 | 194 | 263 | 0 | 3 | 39 | |||
Ⅴ | 67 | 114 | 196 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |||
Ⅵ | 28 | 47 | 121 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||||
Ⅷ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
稳定群落 | Ⅰ | 283 | 22 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 128 | 206 | 0 | 11 | |||||
Ⅲ | 89 | 108 | 17 | 8 | |||||
Ⅳ | 89 | 89 | 147 | 11 | 14 | 13 | |||
Ⅴ | 33 | 61 | 85 | 11 | 11 | 10 | |||
Ⅵ | 39 | 36 | 63 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 11 | ||
Ⅶ | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | |||||
Ⅷ | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | |||||
顶极群落 | Ⅰ | 161 | 6 | ||||||
Ⅱ | 94 | 128 | 28 | 17 | |||||
Ⅲ | 78 | 86 | 0 | 14 | |||||
Ⅳ | 78 | 78 | 103 | 22 | 11 | 14 | |||
Ⅴ | 61 | 69 | 78 | 17 | 19 | 17 | |||
Ⅵ | 44 | 53 | 65 | 33 | 25 | 18 | 18 | ||
Ⅶ | 17 | 25 | 22 | 19 | |||||
Ⅷ | 17 | 17 | 21 | 18 |
[1] |
HARCOME P A, 1987. Tree life tables[J]. BioScience, 37(8): 557-568.
DOI URL |
[2] |
HUGHES R N, BEGON M, MORTIMER M, 1982. Population Ecology: A Unified Study of Animals and Plants[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 19(1): 312.
DOI URL |
[3] |
IMAI N, SEINO T, AIBA S I, et al., 2012. Effects of selective logging on tree species diversity and composition of Bornean tropical rain forests at different spatial scales[J]. Plant Ecology, 213(9): 1413-1424.
DOI URL |
[4] | KEIVAN B F, OMID G M, 2012. Selective logging and damage to unharvested trees in a Hyrcanian forest of Iran[J]. Bioresources, 7(4): 4867-4874. |
[5] |
LI W, ZHANG G F, 2015. Population structure and spatial pattern of the endemic and endangered subtropical tree Parrotia subaequalis (Hamamelidaceae)[J]. Flora, 212: 10-18.
DOI URL |
[6] |
MATHY A S, BRANG P, STILLHARD J, et al., 2021. Long-term tree species population dynamics in Swiss forest reserves influenced by forest structure and climate[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 481: 118666.
DOI URL |
[7] |
NATHAN R, MULLER-LANDAU H C, 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(7): 278-285.
DOI URL |
[8] | WEI X Z, WU H, MENG H J, et al., 2015. Regeneration dynamics of Euptelea pleiospermum along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients: Trade-offs between seedling and sprout[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 353: 232-239. |
[9] |
VINOD K B, CHANDRA P K, BHAGWATI P N, et al., 2013. Spatial distribution and regeneration of Quercus semecarpifolia and Quercus floribunda in a subalpine forest of Western Himalaya, India[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 19: 443-448.
DOI URL |
[10] | WRIGHT S J, MULLER-LANDAU H C, OSVALDO C, et al., 2015. Annual and spatial variation in seedfall and seedling recruitment in a neotropical forest[J]. Ecology, 86(4): 568-584. |
[11] | 陈晓德, 1998. 植物种群与群落结构动态量化分析方法研究[J]. 生态学报, 18(2):104-107. |
CHEN X D, 1998. A study on the method of quantitative analysis for plant population and community structural dynamics[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 18(2): 104-107. | |
[12] | 陈科屹, 张会儒, 张博, 等, 2021. 长白山北坡天然次生林典型建群种的种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 41(13): 5142-5152. |
CHEN K Y, ZHANG H R, ZHANG B, et al., 2021. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of typical constructive species in natural secondary forest on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(13): 5142-5152. | |
[13] | 陈国鹏, 鲜骏仁, 曹秀文, 等, 2016. 林窗对岷江冷杉幼苗生存过程的影响[J]. 生态学报, 36(20): 6475-6486. |
CHEN G P, XIAN J R, CAO X W, et al., 2016. Effects of canopy gap on the survival dynamics of Abies faxoniana seedlings in a subalpine coniferous forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(20): 6475-6486. | |
[14] |
董灵波, 马榕, 田栋元, 等, 2022. 大兴安岭天然林不同演替阶段共优势种种群结构与动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(8): 2077-2087.
DOI |
DONG L B, MA R, TIAN D Y, et al., 2022. Structure and dynamics of co-dominant species in different succession stages of natural forests in Daxing’an Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(8): 2077-2087. | |
[15] | 董雪, 杜昕, 孙志虎, 等, 2020. 生境梯度影响下的天然红松种群空间格局与种内关联[J]. 生态学报, 40(15): 5239-5246. |
DONG X, DU X, SUN Z H, et al., 2020. Spatial pattern and intraspecific association of natural Korean pine population under the influence of habitat gradient[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(15): 5239-5246. | |
[16] | 代力民, 邵国凡, 陈高, 等, 2003. 长白山森林的采伐更新方式[J]. 林业研究, 14(1): 56-60. |
DAI L M, SHAO G F, CHEN G, et al., 2003. Forest cutting and regeneration methodology on Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 14(1): 56-60.
DOI URL |
|
[17] | 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会, 1993. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 56-57. |
Editorial Committee of Flora of China, 1993. Flora of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 56-57. | |
[18] | 葛剑平, 郭海燕, 陈动, 1990. 小兴安岭天然红松林种群结构的研究[J]. 东北林业大学学报 (6): 26-32. |
GE J P, GUO H Y, CHEN D, 1990. Study on age structure and spatial pattern of old-growth Korean pine forest in lesser xingan mountain[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (6): 26-32. | |
[19] |
郭丽珠, 赵欢, 吕进英, 等, 2020. 退化典型草原狼毒种群结构与数量动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 31(9): 2977-2984.
DOI |
GUO L Z, ZHAO H, LÜ J Y, et al., 2020. Population structure and quantitative dynamics of Stellera chamaejasme in degraded typical steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(9): 2977-2984. | |
[20] | 郭聃, 2014. 长白山植被垂直带地形控制机制研究[D]. 吉林: 东北师范大学: 53-54. |
GUO D, 2014. The study of topographic controls on altitudinal belt on Changbai Mountain[D]. Jilin: Northeast Normal University: 53-54. | |
[21] | 胡云云, 亢新刚, 赵俊卉, 2009. 长白山地区天然林林木年龄与胸径的变动关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 37(11): 38-42. |
HU Y Y, KANG X G, ZHAO J H, 2009. Variable relationship between tree age and diameter at breast height for natural forests in Changbai mountains[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 37(11): 38-42. | |
[22] | 胡元洁, 巨天珍, 米彩燕, 等, 2013. 小陇山国家级自然保护区华山松种群更新动态分析[J]. 广西植物, 33(2): 247-252. |
HU Y J, JU T Z, MI C Y, et al., 2013. Study on the populations regeneration dynamics of Pinus armandii in Xiaolongshan Nature Reserve[J]. Guihaia, 33(2): 247-252. | |
[23] | 黄寰, 2012. 区际生态补偿论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社:449. |
HUANG H, 2012. On Interregional Eco-compensation[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press:449. | |
[24] | 解婷婷, 苏培玺, 周紫鹃, 等, 2014. 荒漠绿洲过渡带沙拐枣种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 34(15): 4272-4279. |
JIE T T, SU P X, ZHOU Z J, et al., 2014. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Calligonum mongolicum population in the desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(15): 4272-4279. | |
[25] | 李文英, 李欣, 甘小洪, 2018. 濒危植物水青树的种群结构与数量动态[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 47(3): 222-228. |
LI W Y, LI X, GAN X H, 2018. Population structure and dynamics of endangered plant Tetracentron sinense[J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 47(3): 222-228. | |
[26] | 李俊清, 崔国发, 臧润国, 2000. 小兴安岭五营林区森林生态系统经营研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 22(4): 25-34. |
LI J Q, CUI G F, ZANG R G, 2000. Studies on forest ecosystems management of Wuying forest areas in the lesser Xing’an mountains of Northeast China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 22(4): 25-34. | |
[27] | 李艳丽, 杨华, 亢新刚, 等, 2014. 长白山云冷杉种群结构和动态分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 36(3): 18-25. |
LI Y L, YANG H, KANG X G, et al., 2014. Population structures and dynamics of Abies nephrolepis and Picea koraiensis in the Changbai Mountains of northeastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 36(3): 18-25. | |
[28] | 施军琼, 魏虹, 2020. 植物种群结构分析及生命表构建的实验教学设计[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 45(10): 152-156. |
SHI J Q, WEI H, 2020. Experimental teaching design of structure analysis and life table construction in plant population[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 45(10): 152-156. | |
[29] | 孙一荣, 朱教君, 于立忠, 等, 2009. 不同光环境对红松幼苗光合生理特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 28(5): 850-857. |
SUN Y R, ZHU J J, YU L Z, et al., 2009. Photosynthetic characteristics of Pinus koraiensis seedlings under different light regimes[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28(5): 850-857. | |
[30] | 宋萍, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等, 2005. 珍稀濒危植物桫椤种群结构与动态研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 16(3): 413-418. |
SONG P, HONG W, WU C Z, et al., 2005. Population structure and its dynamics of rare and endangered plant Alsophila spinulosa[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(3): 413-418. | |
[31] | 矢佳昱, 韩海荣, 程小琴, 等, 2017. 河北辽河源自然保护区油松种群年龄结构和种群动态[J]. 生态学杂志, 36(7): 1808-1814. |
SHI J Y, HAN H R, CHENG X Q, et al., 2017. Age structure and dynamics of Pinus tabuliformis population in the Liaoheyuan Nature Reserve of Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36(7): 1808-1814. | |
[32] | 田胜尼, 陈鑫, 李仁远, 等, 2020. 安徽宁国珍稀濒危植物华东黄杉的种群动态研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 28(4): 385-393. |
TIAN S N, CHEN X, LI R Y, et al., 2020. Studies on population dynamics of an endangered plant of Pseudotsuga gaussenii in Ningguo, Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 28(4): 385-393. | |
[33] | 谭一波, 詹潮安, 肖泽鑫, 等, 2010. 广东南澳岛中华楠种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 29(10): 1901-1906. |
TAN Y B, ZHAN C A, XIAO Z X, et al., 2010. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of Machilus chinensisin Nan’ao Island, Guangdong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29(10): 1901-1906. | |
[34] |
王立龙, 王亮, 张丽芳, 等, 2015. 不同生境下濒危植物裸果木种群结构及动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 39(10): 980-989.
DOI |
WANG L L, WANG L, ZHANG L F, et al., 2015. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Gymnocarpos przewalskii in different habitats[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39(10): 980-989.
DOI URL |
|
[35] | 魏雪莹, 叶育石, 林喜珀, 等, 2020. 极小种群植物猪血木的种群现状及保护对策[J]. 植物生态学报, 44(12): 1236-1246. |
WEI X Y, YE Y S, LIN X P, et al., 2020. Population status and conservation of an extremely small population species Euryodendron excelsum[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44(12): 1236-1246.
DOI URL |
|
[36] | 王泳腾, 黄治昊, 王俊, 等, 2021. 燕山山脉黄檗种群结构与动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 41(7): 2826-2834. |
WANG Y T, HUANG Z H, WANG J, et al., 2021. The population structure and dynamic characteristics of Phellodendron amurense in Yanshan Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(7): 2826-2834. | |
[37] |
王飞, 霍怀成, 赵阳, 等, 2019. 甘南高山林线岷江冷杉—杜鹃种群结构与动态[J]. 植物研究, 39(5): 664-672.
DOI |
WANG F, HUO H C, ZHAO Y, et al., 2019. Population Structure and Dynamics of Original Abies faxoniana Rehd-Rhododendron simsii Planch in High-mountain Timberline of Southern Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 39(5): 664-672.
DOI |
|
[38] | 徐化成, 1990. 大兴安岭森林采伐更新的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报 (S4):1-8. |
XU H C, 1990. Study on forest harvesting renewal in Daxing 'anling[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (S4):1-8. | |
[39] | 徐化成, 2001. 中国红松天然林[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社:63. |
XU H C, 2001. Natural Forests of Pinus koraiensis in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House:63. | |
[40] | 徐振邦, 代力民, 陈吉泉, 等, 2001. 长白山红松阔叶混交林森林天然更新条件的研究[J]. 生态学报, 21(9): 1413-1420. |
XU Z B, DAI L M, CHEN J Q, et al., 2001. Natural regeneration condition in Pinus koraiensis broad-leaved mixed forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(9): 1413-1420. | |
[41] |
徐玮泽, 刘琪璟, 孟盛旺, 等, 2018. 长白山阔叶红松林树木种群动态的长期监测[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(10): 3159-3166.
DOI |
XU W Z, LIU Q J, MENG S W, et al., 2018. Long-term monitoring of tree population dynamics of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(10): 3159-3166. | |
[42] | 肖宜安, 肖南, 胡文海, 等, 2007. 濒危植物长柄双花木自然种群年龄结构及其生态对策[J]. 广西植物, 27(6): 850-854. |
XIAO Y A, XIAO N, HU W H, et al., 2007. The age structure and ecological strategy in a wild population of the endangered plant Disanthus cercidifolius var.longipes (Hamamelidaceae)[J]. Guihaia, 27(6): 850-854. | |
[43] | 杨清培, 郝占庆, 2006. 长白山林区森林资源变化及其社会效应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 34(6): 92-96. |
YANG Q P, HAO Z Q, 2006. Variation of Forest Resources in Forest Region of Changbai Mountains and Its Social Effects[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 34(6): 92-96. | |
[44] | 杨凤翔, 王顺庆, 徐海根, 等, 1991. 生存分析理论及其在研究生命表中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 11(2): 153-158. |
YANG F X, WANG S Q, XU H G, et al., 1991. The theory of survival analysis and its application to life table[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 11(2): 153-158. | |
[45] |
于大炮, 周旺明, 周莉, 等, 2019. 长白山区阔叶红松林经营历史与研究历程[J]. 应用生态学报, 30(5): 1426-1434.
DOI |
YU D P, ZHOU W M, ZHOU L, et al., 2019. Exploring the history of the management theory and technology of broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) forest in Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30(5): 1426-1434.
DOI |
|
[46] | 于大炮, 周旺明, 包也, 等, 2015. 天保工程实施以来东北阔叶红松林的可持续经营[J]. 生态学报, 35(1): 10-17. |
YU D P, ZHOU W M, BAO Y, et al., 2015. Forest management of Korean pine and broadleaf mixed forest in Northeast China since the implementation of Natural Forest Protection Project[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(1): 10-17.
DOI URL |
|
[47] | 张群, 范少辉, 沈海龙, 2003. 红松混交林中红松幼树生长环境的研究进展及展望[J]. 林业科学研究, 16(2): 216-224. |
ZHANG Q, FAN S H, SHEN H L, 2003. Research and Development on the Growth Environment of the Young Tree of Pinus koraiensis in Pinus koraiensis-Broadleaved Mixed Forest[J]. Forest Research, 16(2): 216-224. | |
[48] |
张晓鹏, 于立忠, 杨晓燕, 等, 2022. 辽东山区天然更新红松幼苗种群结构与动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(2): 289-296.
DOI |
ZHANG X P, YU L Z, YANG X Y, et al., 2022. Population structure and dynamics of Pinus koraiensis seedlings regenerated from seeds in a montane region of eastern Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(2): 289-296. | |
[49] | 张志祥, 2009. 九龙山自然保护区珍稀濒危植物南方铁杉种群生态学研究[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学:55. |
ZHANG Z X, 2009. Studies on population ecology of rare and endangered plant Tsuga chinensis var. tchekiangensis in Jiulongshan national nature reserve[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University:55. | |
[50] | 张婕, 上官铁梁, 段毅豪, 等, 2014. 灵空山辽东栎种群年龄结构与动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 25(11): 3125-3130. |
ZHANG J, SHANGGUAN T L, DUAN Y H, et al., 2014. Age structure and dynamics of Quercus wutaishanica population in Lingkong Mountain of Shanxi Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(11): 3125-3130. | |
[51] | 赵阳, 曹秀文, 李波, 等, 2020. 甘肃南部林区4种天然林种群结构特征[J]. 林业科学, 56(9): 21-29. |
ZHAO Y, CAO X W, LI B, et al., 2020. Structural characteristics of 4 natural populations in the southern forest region of Gansu Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 56(9): 21-29. | |
[52] |
张金峰, 葛树森, 梁金花, 等, 2022. 长白山阔叶红松林红松种群年龄结构与数量动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 46(6): 667-677.
DOI |
ZHANG J F, GE S S, LIANG J H, et al., 2022. Population age structure and dynamics of Pinus koraiensis in a broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 46(6): 667-677.
DOI URL |
|
[53] | 周祥, 耿月锋, 苏平, 2019. 植物保护理论分析及其技术发展前沿探究[M]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社: 181. |
[ ZHOU X, GENG Y F, SU p, 2019. Theoretical analysis of plant protection and its technological development frontier [M]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University Press: 181. | |
[54] | 张悦, 易雪梅, 王远遐, 等, 2015. 采伐对红松种群结构与动态的影响[J]. 生态学报, 35(1): 38-45. |
ZHANG Y, YI X M, WANG Y X, et al., 2015. Impact of tree harvesting on the population structure and dynamics of Pinus koraiensis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(1): 38-45. |
[1] | ZHANG Xingwang, XIE Yanping, WU Xiaomin, LI Yao, XIAO Shuping. Population Structure and Dynamic Characteristics of Wild Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations of Camptotheca acuminata in Mingxi, Fujian Province, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1037-1044. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn