Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2100-2108.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.10.017
• Research Articles • Previous Articles
WU Yan1(), JIN Tuo2, WANG Yuefei1, HE Pengcheng3, LUO Jun1, LIU Hongjin1,*(
), ZHANG Lei1,*(
), GUO Xiaoyu1, CHEN Ruiying4
Received:
2021-06-09
Online:
2021-10-18
Published:
2021-12-21
Contact:
LIU Hongjin,ZHANG Lei
武岩1(), 靳拓2, 王跃飞1, 贺鹏程3, 罗军1, 刘宏金1,*(
), 张雷1,*(
), 郭晓宇1, 陈瑞英4
通讯作者:
刘宏金,张雷
作者简介:
武岩(1991年生),男,农艺师,硕士研究生,主要从事农业面源污染防治方面的研究。E-mail: 824079115@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WU Yan, JIN Tuo, WANG Yuefei, HE Pengcheng, LUO Jun, LIU Hongjin, ZHANG Lei, GUO Xiaoyu, CHEN Ruiying. Feasibility Analysis of PBAT/PLA Biodegradable Plastic Film for Potatoes in the Northern Foot of Yinshan Mountain in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(10): 2100-2108.
武岩, 靳拓, 王跃飞, 贺鹏程, 罗军, 刘宏金, 张雷, 郭晓宇, 陈瑞英. 内蒙古阴山北麓马铃薯应用PBAT/PLA全生物降解地膜可行性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(10): 2100-2108.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.10.017
地膜种类 Types of mulching film | 原料 Raw material | 宽度 Width/ cm | 厚度 Thickness/μm | 颜色 Colour |
---|---|---|---|---|
上海弘睿全生物降解地膜 Shanghai hongrui biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.8 | 黑色Black |
巴斯夫全生物降解地膜 BASF biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.7 | 黑色Black |
兰州鑫银环全生物降解地膜 Lanzhou xinyinhuan biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.6 | 黑色Black |
普通PE地膜 Common polyethylene plastic (PE) mulch film | PE | 80 | 9.8 | 黑色Black |
Table 1 The information of test mulch film
地膜种类 Types of mulching film | 原料 Raw material | 宽度 Width/ cm | 厚度 Thickness/μm | 颜色 Colour |
---|---|---|---|---|
上海弘睿全生物降解地膜 Shanghai hongrui biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.8 | 黑色Black |
巴斯夫全生物降解地膜 BASF biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.7 | 黑色Black |
兰州鑫银环全生物降解地膜 Lanzhou xinyinhuan biodegradable plastic film | PBAT/ PLA | 80 | 9.6 | 黑色Black |
普通PE地膜 Common polyethylene plastic (PE) mulch film | PE | 80 | 9.8 | 黑色Black |
降解阶段Degradation stage | 分级标准 Grading standards |
---|---|
诱导期 Induction period | 覆膜到垄(畦)面地膜出现多处(每延长1 m 3处以上)≤2 cm自然裂缝或孔洞 There are many natural cracks or holes (more than 3 per extended meter) ≤2 cm from film mulching to ridge (border) surface |
开裂期 Cracking period | 垄(畦)面地膜出现≥2 cm、≤20 cm自然裂缝或孔洞 Natural cracks or holes ≥2 cm and ≤20 cm appear in the film on the ridge (border) surface |
大裂期 Rift stage | 垄(畦)面地膜出现≥20 cm自然裂缝 There are ≥20 cm natural cracks in the film on the ridge (border) surface |
破碎期Fragmentation period | 膜柔韧性尽失,垄(畦)面地膜出现碎裂,最大地膜残片面积≤16 cm2 The film flexibility is completely lost, the film on the ridge (border) surface is broken, and the maximum film fragment area is≤16 cm2 |
无膜期 No membrane period | 垄(畦)面地膜基本见不到地膜残片 There are basically no film fragments on the ridge (border) surface |
Table 2 Grading standard for degradation stage of biodegradable mulching film
降解阶段Degradation stage | 分级标准 Grading standards |
---|---|
诱导期 Induction period | 覆膜到垄(畦)面地膜出现多处(每延长1 m 3处以上)≤2 cm自然裂缝或孔洞 There are many natural cracks or holes (more than 3 per extended meter) ≤2 cm from film mulching to ridge (border) surface |
开裂期 Cracking period | 垄(畦)面地膜出现≥2 cm、≤20 cm自然裂缝或孔洞 Natural cracks or holes ≥2 cm and ≤20 cm appear in the film on the ridge (border) surface |
大裂期 Rift stage | 垄(畦)面地膜出现≥20 cm自然裂缝 There are ≥20 cm natural cracks in the film on the ridge (border) surface |
破碎期Fragmentation period | 膜柔韧性尽失,垄(畦)面地膜出现碎裂,最大地膜残片面积≤16 cm2 The film flexibility is completely lost, the film on the ridge (border) surface is broken, and the maximum film fragment area is≤16 cm2 |
无膜期 No membrane period | 垄(畦)面地膜基本见不到地膜残片 There are basically no film fragments on the ridge (border) surface |
Fig. 1 Dynamic change of soil temperature under different mulching films F1, Shanghai Hongrui biodegradable plastic film; F2, BASF biodegradable plastic film; F3, Lanzhou Xinyinhuan biodegradable plastic film; CK, common polyethylene plastic (PE) mulch film; OF, bare ground without film, the same below
处理 Treatments | 2019年不同生育期平均土壤温度 Average soil temperature in different growth periods in 2019/℃ | 2020年不同生育期平均土壤温度 Average soil temperature in different growth periods in 2020/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS | TE | SD | GS | TE | SD | ||
F1 | 18.86±0.42bc | 19.06±0.37a | 14.77±0.30a | 19.15±0.60a | 20.68±0.32b | 15.98±0.11a | |
F2 | 19.62±0.42a | 19.71±1.87a | 14.90±0.74a | 19.48±0.26a | 20.41±0.15b | 15.83±0.45a | |
F3 | 18.85±0.31bc | 19.06±0.20a | 15.21±0.31a | 19.18±0.40a | 20.90±0.32ab | 16.11±0.11a | |
CK | 19.40±0.26ab | 19.57±1.74a | 14.94±0.50a | 19.44±0.42a | 20.98±0.36a | 16.04±0.30a | |
OF | 17.50±0.23d | 19.86±0.85a | 14.94±0.40a | 17.79±0.05b | 21.43±0.45a | 15.82±0.25a |
Table 3 Effects of different biodegradable plastic films on average soil temperature in different growth periods of potato
处理 Treatments | 2019年不同生育期平均土壤温度 Average soil temperature in different growth periods in 2019/℃ | 2020年不同生育期平均土壤温度 Average soil temperature in different growth periods in 2020/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS | TE | SD | GS | TE | SD | ||
F1 | 18.86±0.42bc | 19.06±0.37a | 14.77±0.30a | 19.15±0.60a | 20.68±0.32b | 15.98±0.11a | |
F2 | 19.62±0.42a | 19.71±1.87a | 14.90±0.74a | 19.48±0.26a | 20.41±0.15b | 15.83±0.45a | |
F3 | 18.85±0.31bc | 19.06±0.20a | 15.21±0.31a | 19.18±0.40a | 20.90±0.32ab | 16.11±0.11a | |
CK | 19.40±0.26ab | 19.57±1.74a | 14.94±0.50a | 19.44±0.42a | 20.98±0.36a | 16.04±0.30a | |
OF | 17.50±0.23d | 19.86±0.85a | 14.94±0.40a | 17.79±0.05b | 21.43±0.45a | 15.82±0.25a |
Fig. 2 Characteristics of water permeability for different mulching film Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P<0.05), the same below
年份Years | 处理Treatments | 降解率 Degradation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
作物覆膜栽培区 Crop film mulching cultivation area | 降解地膜填埋区 Degradable plastic film landfill | |||||||
覆膜后60 d | 覆膜后90 d | 覆膜后120 d | 填埋后180 d | 填埋后365 d | 填埋后540 d | |||
60 days after coating | 90 days after coating | 120 days after coating | 180 days after landfill | 365 days after landfill | 540 days after landfill | |||
2019 | F1 | 16.96±2.96a | 31.68±4.98a | 34.21±1.8a | 80.12±4.22a | 97.53±2.52a | 97.68±0.82a | |
F2 | 19.66±4.43a | 36.51±7.23a | 40.14±7.47a | 75.32±14.02a | 96.88±2.94a | 97.54±2.50a | ||
F3 | 8.78±2.23b | 13.54±4.21b | 15.47±3.19b | 53.61±11.04b | 85.43±9.37b | 98.54±1.01a | ||
CK | 0.74±0.17c | 1.02±0.17c | 1.54±1.01c | 2.63±1.01c | 3.73±2.30c | 6.99±1.95b | ||
2020 | F1 | 22.29±5.18a | 30.54±7.4a | 42.74±5.92a | 85.06±5.82a | 97.44±1.81a | - | |
F2 | 20.78±5.78a | 26.84±7.1a | 34.64±4.64a | 87.10±6.63a | 98.03±1.51a | - | ||
F3 | 11.46±3.53b | 22.34±6.3a | 28.04±3.45c | 70.39±8.66b | 96.60±1.84a | - | ||
CK | 0.96±0.59c | 1.11±0.5b | 1.3±0.63d | 2.30±0.57c | 3.47±1.11b | - |
Table 4 Degradation intensity of different plastic film treatments
年份Years | 处理Treatments | 降解率 Degradation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
作物覆膜栽培区 Crop film mulching cultivation area | 降解地膜填埋区 Degradable plastic film landfill | |||||||
覆膜后60 d | 覆膜后90 d | 覆膜后120 d | 填埋后180 d | 填埋后365 d | 填埋后540 d | |||
60 days after coating | 90 days after coating | 120 days after coating | 180 days after landfill | 365 days after landfill | 540 days after landfill | |||
2019 | F1 | 16.96±2.96a | 31.68±4.98a | 34.21±1.8a | 80.12±4.22a | 97.53±2.52a | 97.68±0.82a | |
F2 | 19.66±4.43a | 36.51±7.23a | 40.14±7.47a | 75.32±14.02a | 96.88±2.94a | 97.54±2.50a | ||
F3 | 8.78±2.23b | 13.54±4.21b | 15.47±3.19b | 53.61±11.04b | 85.43±9.37b | 98.54±1.01a | ||
CK | 0.74±0.17c | 1.02±0.17c | 1.54±1.01c | 2.63±1.01c | 3.73±2.30c | 6.99±1.95b | ||
2020 | F1 | 22.29±5.18a | 30.54±7.4a | 42.74±5.92a | 85.06±5.82a | 97.44±1.81a | - | |
F2 | 20.78±5.78a | 26.84±7.1a | 34.64±4.64a | 87.10±6.63a | 98.03±1.51a | - | ||
F3 | 11.46±3.53b | 22.34±6.3a | 28.04±3.45c | 70.39±8.66b | 96.60±1.84a | - | ||
CK | 0.96±0.59c | 1.11±0.5b | 1.3±0.63d | 2.30±0.57c | 3.47±1.11b | - |
处理Treatments | 投入 Input/(104 yuan∙hm-2) | 产出 Output | 纯利润 Net profit/ (104 yuan∙hm-2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
农资投入 Agricultural input | 租地人工Rented labor | 地膜回收 Plastic film recycling | 合计 Total | 产量 Yield/(t∙hm-2) | 产值 Output value/(104 yuan∙hm-2) | |||
F1 | 2.24 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.44 | 57.93±6.65a | 5.79 | 2.35±0.67ab | |
F2 | 2.235 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.435 | 58.53±4.27a | 5.85 | 2.42±0.43a | |
F3 | 2.205 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.405 | 49.64±2.79bc | 4.96 | 1.56±0.28bc | |
CK | 2.09 | 1.2 | 0.045 | 3.335 | 55.65±3.46ab | 5.56 | 2.23±0.35ab | |
OF | 2.01 | 1.3 | 0 | 3.31 | 42.33±3.08c | 4.23 | 0.92±0.31c |
Table 5 Analysis of potato crop yield and economic benefits treated with different plastic films
处理Treatments | 投入 Input/(104 yuan∙hm-2) | 产出 Output | 纯利润 Net profit/ (104 yuan∙hm-2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
农资投入 Agricultural input | 租地人工Rented labor | 地膜回收 Plastic film recycling | 合计 Total | 产量 Yield/(t∙hm-2) | 产值 Output value/(104 yuan∙hm-2) | |||
F1 | 2.24 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.44 | 57.93±6.65a | 5.79 | 2.35±0.67ab | |
F2 | 2.235 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.435 | 58.53±4.27a | 5.85 | 2.42±0.43a | |
F3 | 2.205 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.405 | 49.64±2.79bc | 4.96 | 1.56±0.28bc | |
CK | 2.09 | 1.2 | 0.045 | 3.335 | 55.65±3.46ab | 5.56 | 2.23±0.35ab | |
OF | 2.01 | 1.3 | 0 | 3.31 | 42.33±3.08c | 4.23 | 0.92±0.31c |
[1] | COZZOLINO E, GIORDANO M, FIORENTINO N, et al., 2020. Appraisal of biodegradable mulching films and vegetal-derived biostimulant application as eco-sustainable practices for enhancing lettuce crop performance and nutritive value[J]. Agronomy Journal, 10(3):427. |
[2] |
GIL-CASTELL O, BADIA J D, KITTIKORN T, et al., 2016. Impact of hydrothermal ageing on the thermal stability, morphology and viscoelastic performance of PLA/sisal biocomposites[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 132:87-96.
DOI URL |
[3] |
GAO H H, YAN C R, LIU Q, et al., 2019. Effects of plastic mulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 651(Part 1):484-492.
DOI URL |
[4] |
GIORDANO M, AMOROSO C G, EL-NAKHEL C, et al., 2020. An appraisal of biodegradable mulch films with respect to strawberry crop performance and fruit quality[J]. Horticulturae, 6(3):48.
DOI URL |
[5] |
MORRO A, CATALINA F, SANCHEZ L E, et al., 2019. Photodegradation and biodegradation under thermophile conditions of mulching films based on poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) and its blend with poly (lactic acid)[J]. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 27(2):352-363.
DOI URL |
[6] |
PALSIKOWSKI P A, KUCHNIER C N, PINHEIRO I F, et al., 2017. Biodegradation in soil of PLA/PBAT blends compatibilized with chain extender[J]. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 26(1):330-341.
DOI URL |
[7] |
ROCHA D B, DE CARVALHO J S, DE OLIVEIRA S A, et al., 2018. A new approach for flexible PBAT/PLA/CaCO3 films into agriculture[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, DOI: 10.1002/app.46660.
DOI |
[8] |
STEINMETZ Z, WOLLMANN C, SCHAEFER M, et al., 2016. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation?[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 550:690-705.
DOI URL |
[9] |
SOUZA P M S, MORALES A R, SANCHEZ E M S, et al., 2018. Study of PBAT photostabilization with ultraviolet absorber in combination with hindered amine light stabilizer and vitamin E, aiming mulching film application[J]. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 26(8):3422-3436.
DOI URL |
[10] |
SHANKAR S, RHIM J W, 2018. Preparation of antibacterial poly (lactide)/ poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) composite films incorporated with grapefruit seed extract[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 120(Part A):846-852.
DOI URL |
[11] | SHEN L X, ZHANG Y M, LAN Y C, et al., 2019. Effects of degradable films with different degradation cycles on soil temperature, moisture and maize yield[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(3):36-44. |
[12] |
WANG Z H, WU Q, FAN B H, et al., 2019a. Testing biodegradable films as alternatives to plastic films in enhancing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 192:196-205.
DOI URL |
[13] |
WANG Z H, WU Q, FAN B H, et al., 2019b. Effects of mulching biodegradable films under drip irrigation on soil hydrothermal conditions and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 213:477-485.
DOI URL |
[14] | 白云龙, 李晓龙, 张胜, 等, 2015. 内蒙古地膜残留污染现状及残膜回收利用对策研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料 (6):139-145. |
BAI Y L, LI X L, ZHANG S, et al., 2015. Study on the current situation of plastic film residue pollution and the countermeasures for the recovery and utilization of residual film in Inner Mongolia[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences (6):139-145. | |
[15] | 段义忠, 张雄, 2018. 生物可降解地膜对土壤肥力及马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 32(1):23-27. |
DUAN Y Z, ZHANG X, 2018. Influence of biodegradable membrane on soil fertility and potato yield[J]. Crop Research, 32(1):23-27. | |
[16] | 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司, 2020. 中国农村统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社: 47-48. |
Department of Rural Social and Economic Survey, 2020. National Bureau of statistics. China Rural Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press: 47-48. | |
[17] | 邓方宁, 林涛, 何文清, 等, 2020. 生物降解地膜覆盖对棉田土壤水-热-盐及产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 39(6):1956-1965. |
DENG F N, LIN T, HE W Q, et al., 2020. Effects of biodegradable plastic film mulching on soil moisture, temperature, salinity and yield of cotton field[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39(6):1956-1965. | |
[18] | 贺鹏程, 刘宏金, 魏静, 等, 2020. 全生物降解膜的降解及其对马铃薯产量性状的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 48(1):30-34. |
HE P C, LIU H J, WEI J, et al., 2020. Degradation of whole biodegradable membrane and its effect on potato yield trait[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 48(1):30-34. | |
[19] | 李海萍, 周杨全, 靳拓, 等, 2017. 不同类型地膜降解特征及其对马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 33(24):36-40. |
LI H P, ZHOU Y Q, JIN T, et al., 2017. Degradation characteristics of different mulch and the effect on potato yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 33(24):36-40. | |
[20] |
马明生, 郭贤仕, 柳燕兰, 2020. 全生物降解地膜覆盖对旱地土壤水分状况及春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 46(12):1933-1944.
DOI |
MA M S, GUO X S, LIU Y L, et al., 2020. Effects of full biodegradable film on soil water status and yield and water use efficiency of spring wheat in dryland[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 46(12):1933-1944. | |
[21] | 曲萍, 郭宝华, 王海波, 等, 2017. PBAT全生物降解地膜在玉米田中的降解特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 33(17):194-199. |
QU P, GUO B H, WANG H B, et al., 2017. Degaradation characteristics of PBAT mulch in maize field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 33(17):194-199. | |
[22] | 申丽霞, 王璞, 张丽丽, 2012. 可降解地膜的降解性能及对土壤温度、水分和玉米生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 28(4):111-116. |
SHEN L X, WANG P, ZHANG L L, 2012. Degradation property of degradable film and its effect on soil temperature and moisture and maize growth[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 28(4):111-116. | |
[23] | 苏海英, 宝哲, 刘勤, 等, 2020. 新疆加工番茄应用PBAT全生物降解地膜可行性[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 37(4):615-622. |
SUN H Y, BAO Z, LIU Q, et al., 2020. Degradation of biodegradable mulch film and its effect on tne yield of processing tomatoes in the Xinjiang region[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 37(4):615-622. | |
[24] | 徐松, 王敬敬, 周婷婷, 等, 2018. 聚己二酸/对苯二甲酸丁二酯塑料地膜高效降解菌群筛选及其群落结构演替特征[J]. 微生物学通报, 45(11):38-49. |
XU S, WANG J J, ZHOU T T, et al., 2018. Screening and community succession of high effective poly (butyleneadipate-co-terephthalate) plastic mulch degrading bacteria[J]. Microbiology China, 45(11):38-49. | |
[25] | 夏文, 林涛, 邓方宁, 等, 2020. 生物降解地膜降解性能对南疆棉田籽棉产量形成的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 37(6):951-959. |
XIA W, LIN T, DENG F N, et al., 2020. Effects of degradation properties of different biodegradable films on cotton yield formation in southern Xinjiang[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 37(6):951-959. | |
[26] | 杨惠娣, 唐赛珍, 1996. 降解塑料试验评价方法探讨[J]. 塑料 (2):16-22. |
YANG H D, TANG S Z, 1996. Discussion on evaluation method of degradable plastics test[J]. Plastics (2):16-22. | |
[27] | 严昌荣, 刘恩科, 舒帆, 等, 2014. 我国地膜覆盖和残留污染特点与防控技术[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 31(2):95-102. |
YAN C R, LIU E K, SHU F, et al., 2014. Review of agricultural plastic mulching and its residual pollution and prevention measures in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 31(2):95-102. | |
[28] | 严昌荣, 何文清, 薛颖昊, 等, 2016. 生物降解地膜应用与地膜残留污染防控[J]. 生物工程学报, 32(6):748-760. |
YAN C R, HE W Q, XUE Y H, et al., 2016. Application of biodegradable plastic film to reduce plastic film residual pollution in Chinese agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 32(6):748-760. | |
[29] | 张妮, 李琦, 侯振安, 等, 2016. 聚乳酸生物降解地膜对土壤温度及棉花产量的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 33(2):114-119. |
ZHANG N, LI Q, HOU Z A, et al., 2016. Effect of Polylactic acid-degradable film mulch on soil temperature and cotton yield[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 33(2):114-119. |
[1] | HU Qirui, JI Chunrong, LI Yingchun, WANG Xuejiao, YANG Mingfeng, GUO Yanyun. Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Cotton at Bud Stage under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1045-1052. |
[2] | WANG Jing, MENG Ke, CHEN Xuan, ZHANG Jiaen, XIANG Huimin, ZHONG Jiawen, SHI Zhaoji. Effects of Acid Rain on Yield, Quality and Physiological Characteristics of Lettuce and Brassica chinensis L. [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1098-1107. |
[3] | JIANG Chaoqiang, LI Chen, ZHU Qifa, XU Haiqing, LIU Yanhong, SHEN Jia, YAN Yifeng, YU Fei, ZU Chaolong. Evaluation of Carbon Sink and Economic Benefit in Different Planting Patterns in Southern Anhui [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1285-1292. |
[4] | LIU Jiang, ZHU Lijie, ZHANG Kai, WANG Xiaoming, WANG Liwei, GAO Xining. Effects of Drought Stress/Rewatering on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Soybean at Different Growth Stages [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 286-296. |
[5] | HUANG Qiaoyi, YU Junhong, HUANG Jianfeng, HUANG Xu, LI Ping, FU Hongting, TANG Shuanhu, LIU Yifeng, XU Peizhi. Nutrient Resources of Main Crop Straw and Its Potential of Substituting for Chemical Fertilizer in Guangdong Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 297-306. |
[6] | CUI Liang, ZHANG Junrui, LI Siyuan. Study on the Benefits of Clean Heating and Emission Reduction of Rural Residents under the Background of Double Carbon [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(10): 2010-2018. |
[7] | SUN Xuejiao, LI Jimei, ZHANG Yutao, LI Xiang, LU Jianjiang, SHE Fei. Characteristics and Influence of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mountain Forest on the North Slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(9): 1821-1830. |
[8] | ZHANG Kai, WANG Liwei, GAO Xining, HE Minghui. Effects of Nitrogen Management on the Potential of N2O Emission Reduction and Yield Increase in Potato Field under Different Precipitation Patterns Based on DNDC Model [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1672-1682. |
[9] | DANG Huihui, LIU Chao, WU Zhurong, WANG Yuanyuan, HU Zhenghua, LI Qi, CHEN Shutao. Methane Emission and Comprehensive Benefits of Japonica Rice Paddy Field with Different Sowing Dates [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1436-1446. |
[10] | WANG Ruijuan, PENG Wenying, LIU Dandan. Research on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Ecological Compensation from the Perspective of Co-construction, Co-governance and Sharing [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(5): 1103-1110. |
[11] | ZHU Yongyong, SONG Bingxi, YANG Wangmin, ZHANG Yupeng, GAO Zhihong, CHEN Xiaoyuan. Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Application on Rice Growth, Yield and Economy Profits under Dry Farming Conditions [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(11): 2150-2156. |
[12] | GE Yinglan, SUN Ting. Soil Microbial Community Structure and Diversity of Potato in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2020, 29(1): 141-148. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn