天保工程20年对黑龙江大兴安岭国有林区森林碳库的影响

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.06.002

生态环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1016-1025.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.06.002

天保工程20年对黑龙江大兴安岭国有林区森林碳库的影响

陈科屹¹(), 林田苗², 王建军¹, 何友均¹^,^*(), 张立文³

1.中国林业科学研究院林业科技信息研究所，北京 100091
2.山合林（北京）水土保持技术有限公司，北京 100038
3.大兴安岭林业集团公司，黑龙江大兴安岭地区 165000

收稿日期:2023-04-02 出版日期:2023-06-18 发布日期:2023-09-01
通讯作者: *何友均（1976年生），男，研究员，博士，研究方向为森林多目标经营管理与评价。E-mail: hyjun163@163.com
作者简介:陈科屹（1989年生），男，助理研究员，博士，研究方向为森林生态与森林经营管理。E-mail: Lowrychen@sina.com
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金面上项目(CAFBB2021MC004);国家林业和草原局专项研究(500102-1734)

Effects of Natural Forest Conservation Project on Forest Carbon Pool of Key State-Owned Forest Region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province in the Past 20 Years

CHEN Keyi¹(), LIN Tianmiao², WANG Jianjun¹, HE Youjun¹^,^*(), ZHANG Liwen³

1. Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, P. R. China
2. Shanhelin (Beijing) Soil and Water Conservation Technology Limited Company, Beijing 100038, P. R. China
3. Daxing’anling Forestry Group Company, Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang 165000, P. R. China

Received:2023-04-02 Online:2023-06-18 Published:2023-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

天然林是中国应对气候变化和落实国家自主贡献的重要载体。科学评估天保工程对实施区域森林碳汇/碳源特征的影响，对于巩固提升区域尺度森林固碳增汇作用和统筹区域生态-经济-社会协调发展具有重要意义。以黑龙江大兴安岭重点国有林区为研究对象，基于多期和多类森林调查和统计数据，运用材积源生物量法，将天保工程实施过程中的人工造林、森林抚育、木材调减、森林巡护等经营管理活动产生的影响纳入核算过程，测算1998—2018年天保工程对该区域森林碳库的影响。结果表明，（1）通过实施天保工程，20年来黑龙江大兴安岭重点国有林区累计产生净固碳量1.32×10⁸ Mg，相当于抵消了同期黑龙江省二氧化碳累计排放量的近12%，且相较于生物质能和碳捕集与封存等工业措施具有明显的成本优势。（2）对存量森林资源开展森林经营管理所产生的森林碳汇量是研究区净固碳量的最大贡献来源，占比高达80.0%。（3）人工造林和调减木材任务在空间布局上的不均，是造成研究区净固碳量存在一定程度空间异质性的主要原因。（4）天保工程在实施过程中引发的碳排放、碳泄漏会抵消研究区的部分固碳效益，但抵消比例仅为0.29%，森林固碳增汇的整体效益不受影响。在后天保工程时代为持续稳定发挥研究区的森林碳库作用，建议从固碳、增汇、保汇3个方面科学强化天然林的保护与修复成效，避免或减少森林碳库无序损耗，创新天然林碳汇价值实现路径，减少计量与监测不确定性影响，实现森林生态系统固碳增汇效能持续提升。

关键词: 天保工程, 材积源生物量法, 碳汇, 碳泄漏, 国有林区

Abstract:

Forest ecosystems are an important resource for China to address climate change and implement its intended nationally determined contributions. It is of great significance to scientifically evaluate the impact of the Natural Forest Protection Project on the characteristics of forest carbon sink/carbon source in the implementation area for consolidating and improving the function of forest carbon sequestration and carbon sink enhancement at the regional scale and coordinating regional eco-economy-society coordinated development. Based on the multi-period and multi-type resource survey and statistics data, using the volume-biomass method, the impacts of Natural Forest Protection Project measures (such as artificial afforestation, forest care, wood reduction, forest patrol, etc.) were included in the estimation process to comprehensively evaluate the impacts of Natural Forest Protection Project on the forest carbon pool in the key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling in Heilongjiang Province, China during 1998-2018. The results showed that (1) through the implementation of the Natural Forest Protection Project, the cumulative net carbon sequestration in the key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling in Heilongjiang Province had been 1.32×10⁸ Mg in the past 20 years, which was equivalent to offsetting nearly 12% of the cumulative carbon dioxide emissions of Heilongjiang Province in the same period, and compared with industrial measures such as biomass energy and carbon capture and storage, it had obvious cost advantages. (2) Among the various measures, forest carbon sequestration generated by forest management measures was the largest contribution to the net carbon sequestration in the study area, accounting for 80.0%. (3) Due to the uneven spatial distribution of the artificial afforestation area and wood reduction task, the net carbon sequestration in the study area had a certain degree of spatial heterogeneity. (4) The carbon emission and carbon leakage caused by the implementation of the Natural Forest Protection Project had offset part of the forest carbon sequestration benefit, but the offset proportion was only 0.29%, and the overall benefit of forest carbon sequestration and sink enhancement was not affected. For the post-Natural Forest Conservation Project to continuously and steadily play the role of forest carbon pool in the study area, we suggest strengthening the effectiveness of natural forest protection and restoration, avoiding or reducing the disorderly loss of forest carbon pool, innovating the realization path of natural forest carbon sink value, reducing the uncertain impact of measurement and monitoring, and finally realizing the continuous improvement of forest ecosystem carbon sequestration and sink benefits.

Key words: Natural Forest Protection Program, volume-biomass method, carbon sequestration, carbon leakage, state-owned forest region

中图分类号:

Q948
X171.4

陈科屹, 林田苗, 王建军, 何友均, 张立文. 天保工程20年对黑龙江大兴安岭国有林区森林碳库的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1016-1025.

CHEN Keyi, LIN Tianmiao, WANG Jianjun, HE Youjun, ZHANG Liwen. Effects of Natural Forest Conservation Project on Forest Carbon Pool of Key State-Owned Forest Region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province in the Past 20 Years[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1016-1025.

图/表 8

参考文献 36

[1]	FAO, 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, Main report[R]. Rome: FAO.
[2]	GREEN J K, KEENAN T F, 2022. The limits of forest carbon sequestration[J]. Science, 376(6594): 692-693. DOI PMID
[3]	HAYWOOD A, STONE C, 2017. Estimating large area forest carbon stocks: Apragmatic design based strategy[J]. Forests, 8(4): 93-99. DOI URL
[4]	JIANG L, ZHAO W, LEWIS B J, et al., 2018. Effects of management regimes on carbon sequestration under the natural forest protection program in northeast China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 29(5): 1187-1194. DOI
[5]	MAGNANI F, DEWAR R C, BORGHETTI M, 2009. Leakage and spillover effects of forest management on carbon storage: Theoretical insights from a simple model[J]. Tellus Seriesb Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 61(2): 385-393.
[6]	MATHIAS N, SEBASTIAN E, HUBERT H, 2023. A simple concept for estimating deadwood carbon in forests[J]. Carbon Management, 14(1): 2197762. DOI URL
[7]	TIMMERMANN V, DIBDIAKOVA J, 2014. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(9): 1593-1606. DOI URL
[8]	WANG J, FENG L, PALMER P I, et al., 2020. Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data[J]. Nature, 586(7831): 720-723. DOI
[9]	WERNICK I K, KAUPPI P E, 2022. Storing carbon or growing forests?[J]. Land Use Policy, 121: 106319. DOI URL
[10]	YAO Y T, PIAO S L, WANG T, 2018. Future biomass carbon sequestration capacity of Chinese forests[J]. Science Bulletin, 63(17): 1108-1117. DOI PMID
[11]	YIN Y H, MA D Y, WU S H, 2018. Climate change risk to forests in China associated with warming[J]. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 493. DOI PMID
[12]	ZHOU W M, LEWIS B J, WU S N, et al., 2014. Biomass carbon storage and its sequestration potential of afforestation under natural forest protection program in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(4): 406-413. DOI URL
[13]	陈科屹, 何友均, 谢和生, 等, 2022a. 黑龙江省大兴安岭重点国有林区复合系统耦合协调发展评价与预测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 38(5): 578-586.
	CHEN K Y, HE Y J, XIE H S, et al., 2022a. Evaluation and prediction of coupling coordinated development of compound system of key state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 38(5): 578-586.
[14]	陈科屹, 王建军, 何友均, 等, 2022b. 黑龙江大兴安岭重点国有林区森林碳储量及固碳潜力评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(9): 1725-1734.
	CHEN K Y, WANG J J, HE Y J, et al., 2022b. Estimations of forest carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of key state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 31(9): 1725-1734.
[15]	范琳, 2019. 山西省天然林保护工程综合效益评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 34(3): 265-272.
	FAN L, 2019. Comprehensive benefit assessment of natural forests protection project in Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry College, 34(3): 265-272.
[16]	国家发展和改革委员会应对气候变化司, 2014. 中国温室气体清单研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社.
	Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission, 2014. Greenhouse gas inventory research in China[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Press.
[17]	国家林业和草原局, 2019. 中国森林资源报告2014-2018[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
	National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 2019. China forest resources report 2014-2018[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
[18]	郭焱, 周旺明, 于大炮, 等, 2015. 长江上游天然林资源保护工程区森林植被碳储量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 24(Z1): 221-228.
	GUO Y, ZHOU W M, YU D P, et al., 2015. Research on forest vegetation carbon storage under the national natural forest protection project in the upper reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24(Z1): 221-228.
[19]	何韵, 费梓萱, 叶新建, 等, 2022. 天保工程碳汇价值评估及对 “碳中和” 的意义研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 19(2): 154-163, 176.
	HE Y, FEI Z X, YE X J, et al., 2022. Evaluation of carbon sink value of NFPP and the significance of “Carbon Neutralization”[J]. Journal of Public Management, 19(2): 154-163, 176.
[20]	胡会峰, 刘国华, 2006. 中国天然林保护工程的固碳能力估算[J]. 生态学报, (1): 291-296.
	HU H F, LIU G H, 2006. Carbon sequestration of China’s national natural forest protection project[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (1): 291-296.
[21]	黄龙生, 王兵, 牛香, 等, 2017. 天保工程对东北和内蒙古重点国有林区保育土壤生态效益的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 15(5): 67-77.
	HUANG L S, WANG B, NIU X, et al., 2017. Evaluation on the influence of natural forest protection program on soil conservation and ecological benefits in key state-owned forest districts in northeast China-Inner Mongolia Area[J] Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(5): 67-77.
[22]	金旻, 2021. 天然林保护始终坚持以人民为中心[N]. 中国绿色时报, 2021-7-30(2).
	JIN M, 2021. Natural forest protection has always been people- centered[N]. China Green Times, 2021-7-30(2).
[23]	李海奎, 雷渊才, 2010. 中国森林植被生物量和碳储量评估[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
	LI H K, LEI Y C, 2010. The assessment of forest vegetation biomass and carbon storage in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
[24]	刘博杰, 逯非, 王效科, 等, 2016. 中国天然林资源保护工程温室气体排放及净固碳能力[J]. 生态学报, 36(14): 4266-4278.
	LIU B J, LU F, WANG X K, et al., 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions and net carbon sequestration of the natural forest protection program in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(14): 4266-4278.
[25]	刘博杰, 逯非, 王效科, 等, 2017. 森林经营与管理下的温室气体排放、碳泄漏和净固碳量研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(2): 673-688.
	LIU B J, LU F, WANG X K, et al., 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon leakage and net carbon sequestration from afforestation and forest management: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(2): 673-688.
[26]	刘迎春, 高显连, 付超, 等, 2019. 基于森林资源清查数据估算中国森林生物量固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 39(11): 4002-4010.
	LIU Y C, GAO X L, FU C, et al., 2019. Estimation of carbon sequestration potential of forest biomass in China based on National Forest Resources Inventory[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 4002-4010.
[27]	宁可, 沈月琴, 朱臻, 等, 2014. 农户杉木经营的固碳能力影响因素及碳供给决策措施[J]. 林业科学, 50(9):129-137.
	NING K, SHEN Y Q, ZHU Z, et al., 2014. Factors of carbon sequestration’s capacity of Chinese fir by households and decision-making measures of carbon supply[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 50(9): 129-137.
[28]	欧光龙, 唐军荣, 王俊峰, 等, 2010. 云南省临沧市膏桐能源林造林碳汇计量[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 16(5): 745-749.
	OU G L, TANG J R, WANG J F, et al., 2010. Carbon accounting of jatropha curcus energy forest in Lincang, Yunnan, China[J]. Chinese Journal Application Environmental Biology, 16(5): 745-749.
[29]	相恒星, 王宗明, 毛德华, 2021. 东北地区天然林资源保护工程生态保护成效分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 38(3): 314-322. DOI
	XIANG H X, WANG Z M, MAO D H, 2021. Ecological effect of natural forest protection project in northeast China[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(3): 314-322. DOI
[30]	张逸如, 刘晓彤, 高文强, 等, 2021. 天然林保护工程区近20年森林植被碳储量动态及碳汇 (源) 特征[J]. 生态学报, 41(13): 5093-5105.
	ZHANG Y R, LIU X T, GAO W Q, et al., 2021. Dynamic changes of forest vegetation carbon storage and the characteristics of carbon sink (source) in the natural forest protection project region for the past 20 years[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(13): 5093-5105.
[31]	张颖, 李晓格, 温亚利, 2022. 碳达峰碳中和背景下中国森林碳汇潜力分析研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 44(1): 38-47.
	ZHANG Y, LI X G, WEN Y L, 2022. Forest carbon sequestration potential in China under the background of carbon emission peak and carbon neutralization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 44(1): 38-47.
[32]	张志达, 2002. 天保工程的实施背景、进展及对策[J]. 林业经济 (1): 36-39.
	ZHANG Z D, 2002. Implementation background, progress and countermeasures of the natural forest protection project[J]. Forestry Economics (1): 36-39.
[33]	赵福生, 师庆东, 衣怀峰, 等, 2015. 克拉玛依造林减排项目温室气体 (GHG) 减排量计算[J]. 干旱区研究, 32(2): 382-387.
	ZHAO F S, SHI Q D, YI H F, et al., 2015. Emission reductions of greenhouse gas of afforestation carbon sequestration projects in Karamay[J]. Arid Zone Research, 32(2): 382-387.
[34]	赵苗苗, 赵娜, 刘羽, 等, 2019. 森林碳计量方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 39(11): 3797-3807.
	ZHAO M M, ZHAO N, LIU Y, et al., 2019. An overview of forest carbon measurement methods[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 3797-3807.
[35]	郑树峰, 王丽萍, 臧淑英, 2021. 大兴安岭天保工程区生态系统服务变化研究[J]. 地理科学, 41(7): 1295-1302. DOI
	ZHENG S F, WANG L P, ZANG S Y, 2021. The change of ecosystem services of natural forest protection project regions in the Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 41(7): 1295-1302. DOI
[36]	中国政府网, 2011. 国家林业局权威解读天然林资源保护工程二期政策[EB/OL]. [2011-05-17]. https://www.gov.cn/govweb/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm。
	Government of the PRC, 2011. State Forestry Administration’s authoritative interpretation of the policy of Natural Forest Resources Protection Project Phase II[EB/OL]. [2011-05-17]. https://www.gov.cn/govweb/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm。

树种 (组)	BEF (分龄组)					R (分龄组)					D	C_F
树种 (组)	幼龄林	中龄林	近熟林	成熟林	过熟林	幼龄林	中龄林	近熟林	成熟林	过熟林	D	C_F
落叶松 Larix gmelinii	1.416	1.644	1.281	1.229	1.150	0.212	0.205	0.211	0.188	0.239	0.490	0.521
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica	2.513	2.919	1.864	1.789	1.827	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.375	0.522
杨树 Aspen spp.	1.446	1.496	1.369	1.390	1.460	0.227	0.259	0.227	0.171	0.209	0.378	0.485
桦树 Birch spp.	1.424	1.526	1.396	1.252	1.109	0.248	0.229	0.279	0.235	0.190	0.541	0.491
柳树 Willow spp.	1.821	1.821	1.821	1.821	1.821	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.443	0.485
红松 Pinus koraiensis	1.510	1.558	1.267	1.413	1.340	0.221	0.223	0.211	0.217	0.215	0.396	0.511
椴树 Linden spp.	1.407	1.407	1.407	1.407	1.407	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.420	0.439
蒙古栎 Quercus mongolica	1.355	1.380	1.327	1.360	1.474	0.292	0.260	0.275	0.410	0.281	0.676	0.500
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandschurica	1.293	1.293	1.293	1.293	1.293	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.464	0.497
云杉 Picea asperata	1.734	2.326	1.516	1.473	1.427	0.224	0.185	0.224	0.244	0.302	0.342	0.521
其他温带杉类	1.667	2.300	1.382	1.459	1.245	0.277	0.302	0.274	0.238	0.218	0.359	0.510
其他温带松类	1.631	1.881	1.461	1.456	1.200	0.206	0.213	0.216	0.202	0.284	0.424	0.511
软阔类	1.586	1.729	1.489	1.254	1.432	0.289	0.278	0.282	0.276	0.412	0.443	0.485
硬阔类	1.674	1.799	1.543	1.172	1.368	0.261	0.257	0.296	0.160	0.294	0.598	0.497

树种 (组)	BEF (分龄组)					R (分龄组)					D	C_F
树种 (组)	幼龄林	中龄林	近熟林	成熟林	过熟林	幼龄林	中龄林	近熟林	成熟林	过熟林	D	C_F
落叶松 Larix gmelinii	1.416	1.644	1.281	1.229	1.150	0.212	0.205	0.211	0.188	0.239	0.490	0.521
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica	2.513	2.919	1.864	1.789	1.827	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.241	0.375	0.522
杨树 Aspen spp.	1.446	1.496	1.369	1.390	1.460	0.227	0.259	0.227	0.171	0.209	0.378	0.485
桦树 Birch spp.	1.424	1.526	1.396	1.252	1.109	0.248	0.229	0.279	0.235	0.190	0.541	0.491
柳树 Willow spp.	1.821	1.821	1.821	1.821	1.821	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.288	0.443	0.485
红松 Pinus koraiensis	1.510	1.558	1.267	1.413	1.340	0.221	0.223	0.211	0.217	0.215	0.396	0.511
椴树 Linden spp.	1.407	1.407	1.407	1.407	1.407	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.201	0.420	0.439
蒙古栎 Quercus mongolica	1.355	1.380	1.327	1.360	1.474	0.292	0.260	0.275	0.410	0.281	0.676	0.500
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandschurica	1.293	1.293	1.293	1.293	1.293	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.221	0.464	0.497
云杉 Picea asperata	1.734	2.326	1.516	1.473	1.427	0.224	0.185	0.224	0.244	0.302	0.342	0.521
其他温带杉类	1.667	2.300	1.382	1.459	1.245	0.277	0.302	0.274	0.238	0.218	0.359	0.510
其他温带松类	1.631	1.881	1.461	1.456	1.200	0.206	0.213	0.216	0.202	0.284	0.424	0.511
软阔类	1.586	1.729	1.489	1.254	1.432	0.289	0.278	0.282	0.276	0.412	0.443	0.485
硬阔类	1.674	1.799	1.543	1.172	1.368	0.261	0.257	0.296	0.160	0.294	0.598	0.497

区域	1998—2010年		2011—2018年		合计
区域	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %
松岭林业局	3.73×10⁴	4.39	7.56×10⁴	4.72	1.13×10⁵	4.60
新林林业局	1.71×10⁴	2.01	3.32×10⁴	2.07	5.03×10⁴	2.05
塔河林业局	7.47×10⁴	8.79	1.27×10⁵	7.93	2.02×10⁵	8.23
呼中林业局	3.06×10⁴	3.61	5.11×10⁴	3.19	8.18×10⁴	3.33
阿木尔林业局	3.25×10⁴	3.80	5.48×10⁴	3.42	8.73×10⁴	3.56
图强林业局	2.93×10⁴	3.45	5.67×10⁴	3.54	8.60×10⁴	3.51
漠河林业局	1.66×10⁵	19.55	2.87×10⁵	17.93	4.53×10⁵	18.49
十八站林业局	2.92×10³	0.34	6.99×10³	0.44	9.91×10³	0.40
韩家园林业局	7.72×10¹	0.01	8.45×10²	0.05	9.22×10²	0.04
加格达奇林业局	4.59×10⁵	54.03	9.09×10⁵	56.72	1.37×10⁶	55.79
合计	8.49×10⁵	100.00	1.60×10⁶	100.00	2.45×10⁶	100.00

区域	1998—2010年		2011—2018年		合计
区域	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %
松岭林业局	3.73×10⁴	4.39	7.56×10⁴	4.72	1.13×10⁵	4.60
新林林业局	1.71×10⁴	2.01	3.32×10⁴	2.07	5.03×10⁴	2.05
塔河林业局	7.47×10⁴	8.79	1.27×10⁵	7.93	2.02×10⁵	8.23
呼中林业局	3.06×10⁴	3.61	5.11×10⁴	3.19	8.18×10⁴	3.33
阿木尔林业局	3.25×10⁴	3.80	5.48×10⁴	3.42	8.73×10⁴	3.56
图强林业局	2.93×10⁴	3.45	5.67×10⁴	3.54	8.60×10⁴	3.51
漠河林业局	1.66×10⁵	19.55	2.87×10⁵	17.93	4.53×10⁵	18.49
十八站林业局	2.92×10³	0.34	6.99×10³	0.44	9.91×10³	0.40
韩家园林业局	7.72×10¹	0.01	8.45×10²	0.05	9.22×10²	0.04
加格达奇林业局	4.59×10⁵	54.03	9.09×10⁵	56.72	1.37×10⁶	55.79
合计	8.49×10⁵	100.00	1.60×10⁶	100.00	2.45×10⁶	100.00

区域	1998—2010年		2011—2018年		合计
区域	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %	碳汇量/ Mg	比例/ %
松岭林业局	4.94×10⁶	7.78	3.29×10⁶	7.78	8.23×10⁶	7.78
新林林业局	6.50×10⁶	10.25	4.34×10⁶	10.25	1.08×10⁷	10.25
塔河林业局	1.11×10⁷	17.53	7.41×10⁶	17.53	1.85×10⁷	17.53
呼中林业局	6.95×10⁶	10.95	4.63×10⁶	10.95	1.16×10⁷	10.95
阿木尔林业局	5.75×10⁶	9.07	3.83×10⁶	9.07	9.59×10⁶	9.07
图强林业局	5.15×10⁶	8.11	3.43×10⁶	8.11	8.58×10⁶	8.11
漠河林业局	5.78×10⁶	9.11	3.85×10⁶	9.11	9.63×10⁶	9.11
十八站林业局	3.03×10⁶	4.78	2.02×10⁶	4.78	5.05×10⁶	4.78
韩家园林业局	9.05×10⁶	14.26	6.03×10⁶	14.26	1.51×10⁷	14.26
加格达奇林业局	5.18×10⁶	8.16	3.45×10⁶	8.16	8.63×10⁶	8.16
合计	6.34×10⁷	100.00	4.23×10⁷	100.00	1.06×10⁸	100.00

天保工程20年对黑龙江大兴安岭国有林区森林碳库的影响

Effects of Natural Forest Conservation Project on Forest Carbon Pool of Key State-Owned Forest Region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province in the Past 20 Years

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 36

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

区域	碳排放量/Mg
区域	人工造林	森林抚育	森林管护	合计	比例%
松岭林业局	1.32×10³ (1.07×10³/2.50×10²)	1.46×10⁴ (8.79×10³/5.83×10³)	3.82×10³ (2.37×10³/1.46×10³)	1.98×10⁴ (1.22×10⁴/7.54×10³)	9.30 (9.19/9.48)
新林林业局	7.38×10² (5.67×10²/1.71×10²)	1.87×10⁴ (1.12×10⁴/7.53×10³)	4.87×10³ (3.02×10³/1.86×10³)	2.44×10⁴(1.48×10⁴/9.55×10³)	11.46 (11.13/12.02)
塔河林业局	9.98×10² (8.28×10²/1.71×10²)	1.92×10⁴ (1.14×10⁴/7.79×10³)	5.16×10³ (3.19×10³/1.96×10³)	2.53×10⁴ (1.54×10⁴/9.92×10³)	11.91 (11.57/12.48)
呼中林业局	1.12×10³ (7.96×10²/3.29×10²)	1.78×10⁴ (1.08×10⁴/6.97×10³)	4.35×10³ (2.69×10³/1.66×10³)	2.33×10⁴ (1.43×10⁴/8.96×10³)	10.96 (10.78/11.26)
阿木尔林业局	6.53×10² (4.43×10²/2.10×10²)	1.24×10⁴ (7.49×10³/4.93×10³)	3.10×10³ (1.92×10³/1.18×10³)	1.62×10⁴ (9.85×10³/6.32×10³)	7.61 (7.41/7.95)
图强林业局	5.39×10² (4.47×10²/9.20×10¹)	1.25×10⁴ (7.48×10³/4.98×10³)	2.84×10³ (1.76×10³/1.08×10³)	1.58×10⁴ (9.68×10³/6.15×10³)	7.45 (7.28/7.73)
漠河林业局	1.49×10³ (8.71×10²/6.18×10²)	1.33×10⁴ (8.08×10³/5.25×10³)	3.34×10³ (2.07×10³/1.27×10³)	1.82×10⁴ (1.10×10⁴/7.14×10³)	8.54 (8.28/8.98)
十八站林业局	6.17×10² (4.33×10²/1.84×10²)	1.39×10⁴ (8.55×10³/5.40×10³)	3.34×10³ (2.07×10³/1.27×10³)	1.79×10⁴ (1.10×10⁴/6.85×10³)	8.42 (8.31/8.62)
韩家园林业局	5.17×10² (2.93×10²/2.23×10²)	1.68×10⁴ (1.01×10⁴/6.67×10³)	3.93×10³ (2.43×10³/1.50×10³)	2.12×10⁴ (1.29×10⁴/8.39×10³)	10.00 (9.67/10.55)
加格达奇林业局	8.45×10³ (8.34×10³/1.18×10²)	1.74×10⁴ (1.06×10⁴/6.79×10³)	4.66×10³ (2.89×10³/1.78×10³)	3.05×10⁴ (2.18×10⁴/8.69×10³)	14.34 (16.38/10.93)
合计	1.64×10⁴ (1.41×10⁴/2.37×10³)	1.57×10⁵ (9.45×10⁴/6.21×10⁴)	3.94×10⁴ (2.44×10⁴/1.50×10⁴)	2.12×10⁵ (1.33×10⁵/7.95×10⁴)	100.00 (100/100)

区域	1998—2010年		2011—2018年		合计
区域	碳泄漏/ Mg	比例/ %	碳泄漏/ Mg	比例/ %	碳泄漏/ Mg	比例/ %
松岭林业局	4.04×10³	5.86	1.09×10⁴	10.38	1.49×10⁴	8.59
新林林业局	1.46×10⁴	21.19	1.92×10⁴	18.28	3.38×10⁴	19.43
塔河林业局	1.25×10⁴	18.14	1.53×10⁴	14.53	2.78×10⁴	15.96
呼中林业局	1.92×10⁴	27.77	1.68×10⁴	16.04	3.60×10⁴	20.69
阿木尔林业局	7.89×10³	11.44	8.58×10³	8.18	1.65×10⁴	9.47
图强林业局	7.45×10³	10.80	9.97×10³	9.50	1.74×10⁴	10.01
漠河林业局	4.07×10³	5.90	9.26×10³	8.82	1.33×10⁴	7.66
十八站林业局	1.91×10³	2.77	1.10×10⁴	10.52	1.30×10⁴	7.45
韩家园林业局	-2.71×10³	-3.93	3.89×10³	3.71	1.18×10³	0.68
加格达奇林业局	4.55×10¹	0.07	5.59×10¹	0.05	1.01×10²	0.06
合计	6.90×10⁴	100.00	1.05×10⁵	100.00	1.74×10⁵	100.00

区域	1998—2010年		2011—2018年		合计
区域	净固碳量/ Mg	比例/ %	净固碳量/ Mg	比例/ %	净固碳量/ Mg	比例/ %
松岭林业局	5.52×10⁶	7.49	4.87×10⁶	8.34	1.04×10⁷	7.87
新林林业局	8.54×10⁶	11.57	7.02×10⁶	12.03	1.56×10⁷	11.78
塔河林业局	1.29×10⁷	17.52	9.65×10⁶	16.52	2.26×10⁷	17.08
呼中林业局	9.62×10⁶	13.05	7.01×10⁶	12.01	1.66×10⁷	12.59
阿木尔林业局	6.87×10⁶	9.32	5.08×10⁶	8.69	1.19×10⁷	9.04
图强林业局	6.20×10⁶	8.41	4.87×10⁶	8.33	1.11×10⁷	8.38
漠河林业局	6.50×10⁶	8.82	5.42×10⁶	9.28	1.19×10⁷	9.02
十八站林业局	3.29×10⁶	4.46	3.55×10⁶	6.09	6.84×10⁶	5.18
韩家园林业局	8.66×10⁶	11.74	6.57×10⁶	11.24	1.52×10⁷	11.52
加格达奇林业局	5.62×10⁶	7.62	4.36×10⁶	7.47	9.98×10⁶	7.55
合计	7.37×10⁷	100.00	5.84×10⁷	100.00	1.32×10⁸	100.00

[1]	郝蕾, 翟涌光, 戚文超, 兰穹穹. 2001-2020年内蒙古植被碳源/碳汇时空动态及对气候因子的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 825-834.
[2]	陈科屹, 王建军, 何友均, 张立文. 黑龙江大兴安岭重点国有林区森林碳储量及固碳潜力评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1725-1734.
[3]	肖国举, 李秀静, 郭占强, 胡延斌, 王静. 贺兰山东麓土壤有机碳对玉米生长发育及水分利用的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1754-1764.
[4]	吴昊平, 秦红杰, 贺斌, 尤毅, 陈金峰, 邹春萍, 杨思雨, 郝贝贝. 基于碳中和的农业面源污染治理模式发展态势刍议[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1919-1926.
[5]	姜超强, 李晨, 朱启法, 徐海清, 刘炎红, 沈嘉, 阎轶峰, 余飞, 祖朝龙. 皖南不同种植模式碳汇效应及经济效益评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1285-1292.
[6]	曹云, 孙应龙, 姜月清, 万君. 黄河流域净生态系统生产力的时空分异特征及其驱动因子分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2101-2110.