基于价值链理论的生态产品价值实现机制理论解析

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.02.022

生态环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 421-428.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.02.022

• 观点 • 上一篇

基于价值链理论的生态产品价值实现机制理论解析

朱锦维(), 柯新利^*(), 何利杰, 周婷, 王青, 任妍钰

华中农业大学公共管理学院，湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2022-10-14 出版日期:2023-02-18 发布日期:2023-05-11
通讯作者: *柯新利（1977年生），男，教授，博士研究生导师，主要从事自然资源经济与管理方面的研究。E-mail: kexl@mail.hzau.edu.cn
作者简介:朱锦维（1993年生），男，博士研究生，主要从事自然资源经济与管理方面的研究。E-mail: zhujw118@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971240);国家自然科学基金青年项目(42101265);湖北省国土整治局（中心）科研计划项目(HBZC-CG-2021-Z1021)

Theoretical Analysis of the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products Based on the Value Chain Theory

ZHU Jinwei(), KE Xinli^*(), HE Lijie, ZHOU Ting, WANG Qing, REN Yanyu

College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China

Received:2022-10-14 Online:2023-02-18 Published:2023-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态产品价值实现是践行“两山理论”的关键，是生态文明建设的重要举措。目前，生态产品价值实现的实践探索稳步推进，但生态产品价值实现机制的理论认识仍然不充分、学理解释相对不足。文章基于价值链理论，利用文献归纳和理论演绎等方法，界定生态产品价值实现的内涵，构建生态产品价值实现的理论机制，并分析典型生态产品价值实现模式的内在逻辑。研究结果表明：（1）生态产品价值实现以满足人们多样化生态需求为目标，反映生态产品从生产到消费的系列价值形成及增值的全过程，且涉及多个主体间利益协调和价值转移，其内涵认识不能仅以经济价值转换结果作为唯一标准；（2）价值链视角下生态产品价值实现取决于生态产品生产、供给、消费的全过程，其关键环节包括生态产品的规划设计、开发整合、运营管理和市场营销等，其重要保障包括产权界定、价值评估、产品认证以及基础设施建设等；（3）不同生态产品价值实现模式反映不同类型生态产品生产、分配、交换、消费的全过程，其中涉及资本、劳动力、管理等多要素投入以及政府、企业、农户等多主体参与，在推进生态产品价值实现的实践中，需兼顾保护与转化的双向逻辑，探索符合区域实际的价值实现模式。基于价值链理论分析生态产品从生产到消费的全过程为探索生态产品价值实现理论机制提供了新视角，对提升生态产品价值实现理论认识和推进生态产品系统开发治理具有重要意义。

关键词: 生态产品, 生态系统服务, 价值实现机制, 价值链理论, 模式

Abstract:

The value realization of ecological products is the key for putting the concept that “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets” into practice and an important measure to construct ecological civilization. At present, the practical exploration of the value realization of ecological products is growing rapidly, but the theoretical explanation of this mechanism is insufficient. Based on the value chain theory, this paper defines the connotation and constructs the theoretical mechanism of value realization of ecological products, as well as analyzes the internal logic of the typical models of value realization of ecological products by applying literature review and inductive deduction. Results show that (1) in order to satisfy human needs of diversified ecology, the value realization of ecological products reflects the process of series of value formation of ecological products from production to consumption, involving the coordination of interests and value transfer among multiple subjects. The value realization of ecological products cannot be perceived solely on the basis of the result of economic value conversion. (2) From the perspective of value chain, the value realization of ecological products depends on the process including production, supply and consumption of ecological products. Also, its key procedures consist of planning and design, development and integration, operation management and marketing of ecological products. It is important for the value realization of the ecological products to clarify the ownership, carrying out the value evaluation and product certification, and building the infrastructure service facilities. (3) Different modes of the value realization of ecological products reflect the whole process of production, distribution, exchange and consumption of different types of ecological products. They involve the inputs of multiple factors, such as capital, labor, and management, as well as the participation of multiple subjects, such as the government, enterprises, and farmers. To promote the practice of value realization of ecological products, it is necessary to give consideration to the two-way logic of protection and transformation, and explore the value realization modes of ecological products in line with regional characteristics. In conclusion, we provide a new perspective for exploring the theoretical mechanism of the value realization of ecological products by analyzing the whole process of ecological products from production to consumption based on the theory of value chain. The results are crucial for improving the theoretical understanding of the value realization of ecological products and promoting the systematic development and governance of ecological products.

Key words: ecological products, ecosystem services, value realization mechanism, the value chain theory, modes

中图分类号:

X196
F301.2

朱锦维, 柯新利, 何利杰, 周婷, 王青, 任妍钰. 基于价值链理论的生态产品价值实现机制理论解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 421-428.

ZHU Jinwei, KE Xinli, HE Lijie, ZHOU Ting, WANG Qing, REN Yanyu. Theoretical Analysis of the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products Based on the Value Chain Theory[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 421-428.

图/表 2

参考文献 46

[1]	BOOKER A, JOHNSTON D, HEINRICH M, 2012. Value chains of herbal medicines-Research needs and key challenges in the context of ethnopharmacology[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140(3): 624-633. DOI URL
[2]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE Groot R, et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260. DOI
[3]	GIEFER M M, AN L, CHEN X D, 2021. Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program[J]. Land Use Policy, 108: 105525. DOI URL
[4]	HINES P, RICH N, BICHENO J, et al., 1998. Value stream management[J]. The international Journal of Logistics Management, 9(1): 25-42. DOI URL
[5]	HOWIESON J, LAWLEY M, HASTINGS K, 2016. Value chain analysis: an iterative and relational approach for agri-food chains[J]. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 21(3): 352-362.
[6]	LAU W W Y, 2013. Beyond carbon: Conceptualizing payments for ecosystem services in blue forests on carbon and other marine and coastal ecosystem services[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 83: 5-14.
[7]	PORTER M E, MILLAR V E, 1985. How information gives you competitive advantage[J]. Harvard Business Review, 63(4): 149-160.
[8]	SONE J S, GESUALDO G C, ZAMBONI P A P, et al., 2019. Water provisioning improvement through payment for ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 1197-1206. DOI
[9]	WUNDER S, 2015. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 117: 234-243. DOI URL
[10]	WUNDER S, BROUWER R, ENGEL S, et al., 2018. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services[J]. Nature Sustainability, 1(3): 145-150. DOI
[11]	YAO R Y, HEINRICH M, WANG Z G, et al., 2018. Quality control of goji (fruits of Lycium barbarum L. and L. chinense Mill): A value chain analysis perspective e[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 224: 349-358. DOI URL
[12]	YOST A, AN L, BILSBORROW R, et al., 2020. Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve[J]. Ecological Economics, 169: 106509. DOI URL
[13]	陈宝山, 黄锡生, 2021. 生态产品财产权的类型化建构与制度表达[J]. 经济体制改革 (6): 178-184.
	CHEN B S, HUANG X S, 2021. Typification and institutionalization of property rights of eco-products[J]. Reform of Economic System (6): 178-184.
[14]	崔莉, 厉新建, 程哲, 2019. 自然资源资本化实现机制研究-以南平市“生态银行”为例[J]. 管理世界, 35(9): 95-100.
	CUI L, LI X J, CHENG Z, 2019. Research on the realization mechanism of natural resources capitalization: A case study of Nanping ecological bank[J]. Management World, 35(9): 95-100.
[15]	高晓龙, 程会强, 郑华, 等, 2019. 生态产品价值实现的政策工具探究[J]. 生态学报, 39(23): 8746-8754.
	GAO X L, CHENG H Q, ZHENG H, et al., 2019. Research on the policy instruments for the value realization of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8746-8754.
[16]	高晓龙, 林亦晴, 徐卫华, 等, 2020. 生态产品价值实现研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 40(1): 24-33.
	GAO X L, LIN Y Q, XU W H, et al., 2020. Research progress on the value realization of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(1): 24-33.
[17]	谷树忠, 2020. 产业生态化和生态产业化的理论思考[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 41(10): 8-14.
	GU S Z, 2020. Theoretical analyses on industrial green transformation and ecological industrialization[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 41(10): 8-14.
[18]	何继新, 陈真真, 2016. 公共物品供给复合主体 “复合型” 协同机制研究-基于 “价值链” 理论视角[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 37(2): 38-45.
	HE J X, CHEN Z Z, 2016. Research on the compound cooperative mechanism of the compound subject of public goods supply from the perspective of value chain theory[J]. Journal of Jishou University (Social Sciences), 37(2): 38-45.
[19]	黄铎, 黎斯斯, 韦慧杰, 等, 2022. 国土空间生态产品价值定义与实现模式研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 29(5): 52-58.
	HUANG D, LI S S, WEI H J, et al., 2022. Research on the value definition and realization mode of ecological products in territorial space[J]. Urban Development Studies, 29(5): 52-58.
[20]	黄群慧, 倪红福, 2020. 基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J]. 经济体制改革 (5): 11-21.
	HUANG Q H, NI H F, 2020. Improving industrial basic capacity and industrial chain level: From the perspective of global value chain[J]. Reform of Economic System (5): 11-21.
[21]	黄如良, 2015. 生态产品价值评估问题探讨[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 25(3): 26-33.
	HUANG R L, 2015. Study on the ecological product value assessment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(3): 26-33.
[22]	金铂皓, 黄锐, 冯建美, 等, 2021. 生态产品供给的内生动力机制释析-基于完整价值回报与代际价值回报的双重视角[J]. 中国土地科学, 35(7): 81-88.
	JIN B H, HUANG R, FENG J M, et al., 2021. Analysis on internal driving mechanism of eco-label product supply: From the perspectives of complete value and intergenerational value[J]. China Land Science, 35(7): 81-88.
[23]	靳诚, 陆玉麒, 2021. 我国生态产品价值实现研究的回顾与展望[J]. 经济地理, 41(10): 207-213.
	JIN C, LU Y Q, 2021. Review and prospect of research on value realization of ecological products in China[J]. Economic Geography, 41(10): 207-213.
[24]	李跟强, 潘文卿, 2016. 国内价值链如何嵌入全球价值链: 增加值的视角[J]. 管理世界 (7): 10-22, 187.
	LI G Q, PAN W Q, 2016. How do domestic value chains embed into global value chains? perspective from value added[J]. Journal of Management World (7): 10-22, 187.
[25]	刘成武, 朱锦维, 2020. 城市圈生态用地违法耗损的共性特征及原因[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 40(5): 140-145.
	LIU C W, ZHU J W, 2020. Common feature and causes of illegal depletion of ecological land in urban circles[J]. Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 40(5): 140-145.
[26]	刘韬, 和兰娣, 赵海鹰, 等, 2022. 区域生态产品价值实现一般化路径探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(5): 1059-1070. DOI
	LIU T, HE L D, ZHAO H Y, et al., 2022. Discussion on the generalization path of regional ecological product value realization[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 31(5): 1059-1070.
[27]	刘向敏, 2020. 生态产品价值实现视域下矿山废弃地生态修复与重建[J]. 中国矿业, 29(11): 72-75, 81.
	LIU X M, 2020. Ecological restoration and reconstrution of mining wasteland from the perspective of value realization of ecological products[J]. China Mining Magazine, 29(11): 72-75, 81.
[28]	柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山, 2018. 生态保护补偿的分析框架研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 38(2): 380-392.
	LIU D, HU Z T, JIN L S, 2018. Review on analytical framework of eco-compensation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(2): 380-392.
[29]	罗必良, 2017. 科斯定理: 反思与拓展-兼论中国农地流转制度改革与选择[J]. 经济研究, 52(11): 178-193.
	LUO B L, 2017. Rethinking and extension of the Coase Theorem: Reform and choice of land circulation institutions in rural China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 52(11): 178-193.
[30]	綦良群, 赵龙双, 2013. 基于产品价值链的生产性服务业与装备制造业的融合研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 43(12): 118-124.
	QI L Q, ZHAO L S, 2013. Research on the fusion of equipment manufacturing and producer services based on the product value-chain[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 43(12): 118-124.
[31]	丘水林, 庞洁, 靳乐山, 2021. 自然资源生态产品价值实现机制: 一个机制复合体的分析框架[J]. 中国土地科学, 35(1): 10-17, 25.
	QIU S L, PANG J, JIN L S, 2021. Value realization mechanism of ecological goods in natural resources: An analytical framework of the regime complex[J]. China Land Science, 35(1): 10-17, 25.
[32]	石敏俊, 陈岭楠, 2022. GEP核算: 理论内涵与现实挑战[J]. 中国环境管理, 14(2): 5-10.
	SHI M J, CHEN L N, 2022. Theoretical connotation and practical challenges of GEP accounting in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 14(2): 5-10.
[33]	寿涌毅, 王伟姣, SLEPNIOV D, 2016. 制造业产品服务系统的价值链设计与重构-基于杭氧的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 28(2): 230-240.
	SHOU Y Y, WANG W J, SLEPNIOV D, 2016. Value chain design and reorganization of Chinese manufacturers’ product service systems: A case study of hangyang[J]. Management Review, 28(2): 230-240.
[34]	王会, 李强, 温亚利, 2022. 生态产品价值实现机制的逻辑与模式: 基于排他性的理论分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 36(4): 79-85.
	WANG H, LI Q, WEN Y L, 2022. The logic and modes of the realization mechanism of ecological product values: A theoretical analysis based on the excludability[J]. China Land Science, 36(4): 79-85.
[35]	吴绍华, 侯宪瑞, 彭敏学, 等, 2021. 生态调节服务产品价值实现的适宜性评价及模式分区-以浙江省丽水市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 35(4): 81-89.
	WU S H, HOU X R, PENG M X, et al., 2021. Suitability assessment and zoning of value realization for ecological regulation services: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang province[J]. China Land Science, 35(4): 81-89.
[36]	杨忍, 刘芮彤, 2021. 农村全域土地综合整治与国土空间生态修复: 衔接与融合[J]. 现代城市研究, 36(3): 23-32.
	YANG R, LIU R T, 2021. Rural comprehensive land consolidation and territorial ecological restoration: Cohesion and integration[J]. Modern Urban Research, 36(3): 23-32.
[37]	杨锐, 钟乐, 赵智聪, 2020. 基于消费端的自然保护地指标交易机制:生态产品的价值实现[J]. 生态学报, 40(18): 6687-6693.
	YANG R, ZHONG L, ZHAO Z C, 2020. Research on consumer-based quota trading mechanism of protected areas: An innovative approach to achieve value of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(18): 6687-6693.
[38]	叶有华, 肖冰, 冯宏娟, 等, 2022. 乡村振兴视域下的生态产品价值实现模式路径研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(2): 421-428. DOI
	YE Y H, XIAO B, FENG H J, et al., 2022. Researches on the pattern and route of ecological product value realization from the perspective of rural revitalization[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 31(2): 421-428.
[39]	尹敬东, 周绍东, 2015. 基于劳动价值论的资源配置理论研究[J]. 经济学动态 (5): 30-36.
	YIN J D, ZHOU S D, 2015. Research on resource allocation theory based on labor theory of value[J]. Economic Perspectives (5): 30-36.
[40]	于贵瑞, 杨萌, 2022. 自然生态价值、生态资产管理及价值实现的生态经济学基础研究-科学概念、基础理论及实现途径[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(5): 1153-1165. DOI
	YU G R, YANG M, 2022. Ecological economics foundation research on ecological values, ecological asset management, and value realization: Scientific concepts, basic theories, and realization paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(5): 1153-1165.
[41]	虞慧怡, 张林波, 李岱青, 等, 2020. 生态产品价值实现的国内外实践经验与启示[J]. 环境科学研究, 33(3): 685-690.
	YU H Y, ZHANG L B, LI D Q, et al., 2020. Practical experience and enlightenment of value implentation of ecological products[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 33(3): 685-690.
[42]	曾贤刚, 虞慧怡, 谢芳, 2014. 生态产品的概念、分类及其市场化供给机制[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 24(7): 12-17.
	ZENG X G, YU H Y, XIE F, 2014. Concept, classification and market supply mechanism of ecological products[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(7): 12-17.
[43]	张林波, 虞慧怡, 郝超志, 等, 2021. 国内外生态产品价值实现的实践模式与路径[J]. 环境科学研究, 34(6): 1407-1416.
	ZHANG L B, YU H Y, HAO C Z, et al., 2021. Practice model and path of ecosystem product value realization[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 34(6): 1407-1416.
[44]	张林波, 虞慧怡, 李岱青, 等, 2019. 生态产品内涵与其价值实现途径[J]. 农业机械学报, 50(6): 173-183.
	ZHANG L B, YU H Y, LI D Q, et al., 2019. Connotation and value implementation mechanism of ecological products[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 50(6): 173-183.
[45]	张锐, 修雨薇, 2020. 区块链技术下的文化价值链重构[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版) (6): 133-143.
	ZHANG R, XIU Y W, 2020. The reconstruction of cultural value chain under the blockchain technology[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition) (6): 133-143.
[46]	张正荣, 杨金东, 2019. 乡村振兴视角下农村电商如何优化 “工业品下行” 路径-基于 “双链” 耦合机制的扎根研究[J]. 农业经济问题 (4): 118-129.
	ZHANG Z R, YANG J D, 2019. How to optimize the path of industrial goods downlink by rural e-commerce from the perspective of rural revitalization: Based on grounded theory research of value chains coupling mechanism[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy (4): 118-129.

基于价值链理论的生态产品价值实现机制理论解析

Theoretical Analysis of the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products Based on the Value Chain Theory

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王琳, 卫伟. 黄土高原典型县域生态系统服务变化特征及驱动因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1140-1148.
[2]	许静, 廖星凯, 甘崎旭, 周茅先. 基于MSPA与电路理论的黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 805-813.
[3]	张平江, 党国锋. 基于MCR模型与蚁群算法的洮河流域生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 481-491.
[4]	喻登科, 熊曼玉. 省域生态产品价值实现能力评价研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 397-406.
[5]	郑晓豪, 陈颖彪, 郑子豪, 郭城, 黄卓男, 周泳诗. 湖北省生态系统服务价值动态变化及其影响因素演变[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 195-206.
[6]	刘香华, 王秀明, 刘谞承, 张音波, 刘飘. 基于外溢生态系统服务价值的广东省生态补偿机制研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 1024-1031.
[7]	刘韬, 和兰娣, 赵海鹰, 张文丽, 曹雪梅. 区域生态产品价值实现一般化路径探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 1059-1070.
[8]	李成伟, 刘章勇, 龚松玲, 杨伟, 李绍秋, 朱波. 稻作模式改变对稻田CH₄和N₂O排放的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 961-968.
[9]	何亚婷, 谢和生, 何友均. 不同经营模式对蒙古栎天然次生林碳储量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 215-223.
[10]	叶锦玉, 虞皓琦, 廖宝文, 游奕来, 刘新科, 林寿明, 杨道德, 胡慧建. 鸟类物种组合模式的稳定性——以珠海淇澳自然保护区红树林鸟类群落变化为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 265-276.
[11]	叶有华, 肖冰, 冯宏娟, 何玉琳, 陈平, 陈晓意, 王丹丹, 曾祉祥, 郭欣. 乡村振兴视域下的生态产品价值实现模式路径研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 421-428.
[12]	廖慧敏, 师凤起, 李明, 朱逸龙. 长沙市典型园林植物叶片的滞尘等级与模式识别研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(1): 110-116.
[13]	相恒星, 张健, 王宗明, 毛德华. 松嫩平原生态系统服务供需研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1769-1776.
[14]	齐静, 邓伟, 周渝, 刘婷, 罗旭. 重庆市生态保护红线成效评估方法与应用[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1532-1540.
[15]	王剑, 包海, 李达毅, 刘智远, 杨娜. 干旱半干旱区夏季绿化树种挥发性有机物标准排放量的测定[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6): 1168-1176.