生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1489-1498.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.07.022
• 综述 •
上一篇
收稿日期:
2022-03-15
出版日期:
2022-07-18
发布日期:
2022-08-31
通讯作者:
*张科利(1962年生),男,教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持相关研究。E-mail: keli@bnu.edu.cn作者简介:
柯奇画(1993年生),女,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持相关研究。E-mail: qihuake@mail.bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2022-03-15
Online:
2022-07-18
Published:
2022-08-31
摘要:
水土流失尺度效应是当前土壤侵蚀领域、水文水资源科学乃至整个地学领域的热点和前沿问题。为了准确把握中国水土流失尺度效应研究进展,从国内外六大中英文论文数据库中获取了776篇相关研究文献作为综述的数据源。基于文献计量方法,从研究概况、发展历程、研究机构、研究区分布和研究手段等方面进行了综述。结果显示,(1)目前中国水土流失尺度效应研究以探讨侵蚀输沙的空间尺度效应为主,其次是径流水文的时间尺度效应,而关于侵蚀输沙的时间尺度效应和径流水文的空间尺度效应的研究则较为薄弱。(2)时间尺度分布上,径流水文研究以年际尺度为主,而侵蚀输沙研究多关注次降雨尺度。空间尺度分布上,以小流域和坡面尺度为主。(3)全国共有240家研究机构参与了相关研究,其中前五强单位依次是:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所、水利部黄河水利委员会、西北农林科技大学、中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所和北京师范大学。(4)研究区的流域分布以黄河和长江为主;水土保持分区以西北黄土高原区、西南紫色土区、南方红壤区和北方土石山区居多;地形区分布以高原和起伏较大的山地丘陵为主;气候区分布湿润、半湿润区以及暖温带、亚热带和中温带居多。(5)研究方法多种多样,大致可分为直接计算、统计分析、模型估算和模拟试验这4类;其中模型估算中涉及到的数学模型共有28个,应用较多的有(R)USLE和SWAT。未来研究的可能发展方向有:极端暴雨事件洪水及其侵蚀输沙的尺度问题;喀斯特地区地下水土流失的尺度问题;水文泥沙连通性的尺度问题;变尺度水文-侵蚀-输沙预报模型;水沙数据多尺度转换。
中图分类号:
柯奇画, 张科利. 基于文献计量的中国水土流失尺度效应研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1489-1498.
KE Qihua, ZHANG Keli. Scale Effect on Water and Soil Loss in China: A Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1489-1498.
[1] |
DONG Y F, WU Y Q, ZHANG T Y, et al, 2013. The sediment delivery ratio in a small catchment in the black soil region of Northeast China[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 28(1): 111-117.
DOI URL |
[2] | DONIGIAN J R. A S, IMHOFF J C, BICKNELL B R, et al., 1984. Application guide for the hydrological simulation program--FORTRAN, EPA 600/3-84-066[R]. Athens, Ga.: U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory. |
[3] |
FERRO V, PORTO P, 2000. Sediment delivery distributed (SEDD) model[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(4): 411-422.
DOI URL |
[4] | LAFLEN J M, LANE L J, FOSTER G R, 1991. WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology[J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 46(1): 34-38. |
[5] |
LI J K, MU C, DENG C N, MA M H, 2020. Hydrologic-environmental effects of sponge city under different spatial scales[J]. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 10(1): 45-56.
DOI URL |
[6] |
LI S C, WANG Z F, ZHANG Y, 2017. Crop cover reconstruction and its effects on sediment retention in the Tibetan Plateau for 1900-2000 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(7): 786-800.
DOI URL |
[7] |
LI T J, WANG G Q, XUE H, et al., 2009. Soil erosion and sediment transport in the gullied Loess Plateau: scale effects and their mechanisms[J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(5): 1283-1292.
DOI URL |
[8] |
LI X J, GAO G M, HU T S, et al., 2014. Multiple time scales analysis of runoff series based on the chaos theory[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(13-15): 2741-2749.
DOI URL |
[9] | LIU B Y, ZHANG K L, XIE Y, 2002. An empirical soil loss equation[C]. Proceedings of 12th ISCO Conference, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. |
[10] | MOU J Z, MENG Q M, 1981. Sediment delivery ratio as used in the computation of watershed sediment yield[J]. Journal of Hydrology: New Zealand, 20(1): 28-38. |
[11] |
NELSON E, MENDOZA G, REGETZ J, et al., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4-11.
DOI URL |
[12] | RENARD K G, FOSTER G R, WEESIES G A, et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)[R]. Washington, DC.: US. Govt. Printing Office. |
[13] |
SRINIVASAN R, ARNOLD J G, 1994. Integration of a basin-scale water-quality model with GIS[J]. Water Resources Bulletin, 30(3): 453-462.
DOI URL |
[14] |
VAN OOST K, GOVERS G, DESMET P, 2000. Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage[J]. Landscape Ecology, 15(6): 577-589.
DOI URL |
[15] |
VAN ROMPAEY A J J, VERSTRAETEN G, Van OOST K, et al., 2001. Modelling mean annual sediment yield using a distributed approach[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26(11): 1221-1236.
DOI URL |
[16] |
WANG C Y, YANG Z S, ZANG M, et al., 2019. Evolution characteristics and variability analyzation of rainfall and runoff based on time scale[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 358(2): 22010.
DOI URL |
[17] | WISCHMEIER W H, SMITH D D, 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning[R]. Washington DC: US. Govt. Printing Office. |
[18] |
ZHANG J P, XIAO H L, ZHANG X, et al., 2019. Impact of reservoir operation on runoff and sediment load at multi-time scales based on entropy theory[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 569: 809-815.
DOI URL |
[19] | 鲍卫锋, 黄介生, 孔祥元, 2006. 多时间尺度的流域水沙演化分析--以清涧河流域为例[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 39(3): 26-30. |
BAO W F, HUANG J S, KONG X Y, 2006. Analysis of hydrological cycle evolvement in river basin under multi time scales: A case study on Qingjian River basin[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 39(3): 26-30. | |
[20] | 蔡强国, 范昊明, 2004. 泥沙输移比影响因子及其关系模型研究现状与评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 23(5): 1-9. |
CAI Q G, FAN H M, 2004. On the factors and prediction models of SDR[J]. Progress in Geography, 23(5): 1-9. | |
[21] | 曹如轩, 1992. 黄河多沙支流暴雨产沙模型[J]. 人民黄河 (10): 31-34, 62. |
CAO R X, 1992. Sediment yield model of heavy rainfall of hyper-sediment concentrated tributaries of the Yellow River[J]. Yellow River (10): 31-34, 62. | |
[22] | 陈国祥, 汤立群, 1996. 流域尺度与治理对产流模式的影响分析研究[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 2(1): 22-28. |
CHEN G X, TANG L Q, 1996. Study on the runoff-generating model influenced by controlling and scale[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 2(1): 22-28. | |
[23] | 崔玉环, 叶柏生, 王杰, 等, 2013. 乌鲁木齐河源1号冰川水文断面不同时间尺度径流估算[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 27(7): 119-126. |
CUI Y H, YE B S, WANG J, et al., 2013. The runoff simulations for the Glacier No.1 hydrologic section at the headwaters of the Urumqi River on the different timescales[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 27(7): 119-126. | |
[24] | 丁文荣, 周跃, 2007. 云南省盘龙河流域河流输沙率变化的多时间尺度分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 14(6): 354-356, 359. |
DING W R, ZHOU Y, 2007. The multi-time scale analysis on the suspended sediment flux of Panlong River basin of Yunnan Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(6): 354-356, 359. | |
[25] |
方海燕, 蔡强国, 李秋艳, 2008. 产沙模数与流域面积关系研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 27(6): 63-69.
DOI |
FANG H Y, CAI Q G, LI Q Y, 2008. A review of the relationship between specific sediment yield and drainage area[J]. Progress in Geography, 27(6): 63-69. | |
[26] |
符素华, 刘宝元, 2002. 土壤侵蚀量预报模型研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 17(1): 78-84.
DOI |
FU S H, LIU B Y, 2002. Evolution of the soil erosion model[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 17(1): 78-84. | |
[27] | 龚时旸, 熊贵枢, 1979. 黄河泥沙来源和地区分布[J]. 人民黄河 (1): 7-18. |
GONG S Y, XIONG G S, 1979. Sources and regional distribution of sediment in the Yellow River[J]. Yellow River (1): 7-18. | |
[28] | 贺亮亮, 张淑兰, 于澎涛, 等, 2017. 泾河流域的降水径流影响及其空间尺度效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 26(3): 415-421. |
HE L L, ZHANG S L, YU P T, et al., 2017. Spatial scale effect of the precipitation influence on runoff in Jinghe basin[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26(3): 415-421. | |
[29] | 黄新会, 王占礼, 牛振华, 2004. 水文过程及模型研究主要进展[J]. 水土保持研究, 11(4): 105-108. |
HUANG X H, WANG Z L, NIU Z H, 2004. Main progress of research on hydrologic processes and prediction models[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 11(4): 105-108. | |
[30] | 李辉, 陈晓玲, 2006. 不同空间尺度下的土壤侵蚀模型研究进展[J]. 华中师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 40(4): 621-624. |
LI H, CHEN X L, 2006. Review of soil erosion model at different spatial scales[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 40(4): 621-624. | |
[31] | 李林育, 焦菊英, 陈杨, 2009. 泥沙输移比的研究方法及成果分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 7(6): 113-122. |
LI L Y, JIAO J Y, CHEN Y, 2009. Research methods and results analysis of sediment delivery ratio[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 7(6): 113-122. | |
[32] | 李勉, 2002. 小流域侵蚀速率与产沙关系的137Cs、210Pbex示踪研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. |
LI M, 2002. Study on the relationship between erosion and sediment yield in small watershed by 137Cs and 210Pbex tracers[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University. | |
[33] | 刘春蓁, 1989. 关于水文气象学研究中的时空尺度问题[J]. 气象科技, 9(2): 54-56. |
LIU C Z, 1989. Spatio-temporal scale in the study of Hydrometeorology[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 9(2): 54-56. | |
[34] | 刘纪根, 蔡强国, 樊良新, 等, 2004. 流域侵蚀产沙模拟研究中的尺度转换方法[J]. 泥沙研究 (3): 69-74. |
LIU J G, CAI Q G, FAN L X, et al., 2004. Methods of scale transfer in modeling of soil erosion and sediment yield in catchments[J]. Journal of Sediment Research (3): 69-74. | |
[35] | 刘纪根, 蔡强国, 刘前进, 等, 2005. 流域侵蚀产沙过程随尺度变化规律研究[J]. 泥沙研究 (4): 7-13. |
LIU J G, CAI Q G, LIU Q J, et al., 2005. Study on the regularity of sediment yield processes in catchments under different scales[J]. Journal of Sediment Research (4): 7-13. | |
[36] | 刘前进, 蔡强国, 刘纪根, 等, 2004. 黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀模型的尺度转换[J]. 资源科学, 26(S1): 81-90. |
LIU Q J, CAI Q G, LIU J G, et al., 2004. Scale transferring of soil erosion model in Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J]. Resources Science, 26(S1): 81-90. | |
[37] | 刘时城, 2017. 延河流域不同尺度水文连通性研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. |
LIU S C, 2017. Research on hydrological connectivity at different scales in Yanhe River catchment[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University. | |
[38] | 倪九派, 2005. 三峡库区水土流失空间尺度效应及其尺度转换研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学. |
NI J P, 2005. Effect of spatial scale and scaling on soil and water loss in Three Gorges Reservoir area[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University. | |
[39] | 綦俊谕, 蔡强国, 蔡乐, 等, 2011. 岔巴沟、大理河与无定河水土保持减水减沙作用的尺度效应[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(1): 95-102. |
QI J Y, CAI Q G, CAI L, et al., 2011. Scale effect of runoff and sediment reduction effects of soil and water conservation measures in Chabagou, Dalihe and Wudinghe basins[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(1): 95-102. | |
[40] | 王静爱, 左伟, 2010. 中国地理图集[M]. 北京: 中国地图出版社: 34-35. |
WANG J A, ZUO W, 2010. Geographic atlas of China[M]. Beijing: Sinomap Press: 34-35. | |
[41] | 王平, 李浩, 陈强, 等, 2014. 典型黑土区不同尺度观测场地融雪径流[J]. 水土保持通报, 34(5): 244-247, 253. |
WANG P, LI H, CHEN Q, et al., 2014. Different scale observation sites of snow melt runoff in typical black soil area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(5): 244-247, 253. | |
[42] | 王治国, 张超, 孙保平, 等, 2015. 全国水土保持区划概述[J]. 中国水土保持 (12): 12-17. |
WANG Z G, ZHANG C, SUN B P, et al., 2015. An overview of national soil and water conservation regionalization of China[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (12): 12-17. | |
[43] | 闫云霞, 许炯心, HASSON M, 等, 2011. 长江流域侵蚀产沙尺度效应的区域分异[J]. 山地学报, 29(2): 141-153. |
YAN Y X, XU J X, HASSON M, et al., 2011. Spatial variation of scale effects of sediment yield in the Yangtze River basin[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 29(2): 141-153. | |
[44] | 杨晓楠, 2019. 黄土高原多尺度景观格局对径流及输沙过程的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. |
YANG X N, 2019. Effects of landscape pattern on runoff and sediment in the Loess Plateau: a multi-scale study[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University. | |
[45] | 余剑如, 1987. 长江上游地面侵蚀与河流泥沙问题的探讨[J]. 人民长江 (9): 21-29. |
YU J R, 1987. Discussion on surface erosion and river sediment in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River (9): 21-29. | |
[46] | 袁再健, 2012. 基于GIS的分布式侵蚀产沙模型及其空间尺度转换研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 28(9): 293-296. |
YUAN Z J, 2012. Research progress on the distributed soil erosion and sediment yield model and its spatial scaling based on GIS[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 28(9): 293-296. | |
[47] | 张风宝, 杨明义, 王光谦, 2011. 坡耕地小区坡面不同坡段侵蚀泥沙贡献率的7Be示踪研究[J]. 泥沙研究 (1): 38-44. |
ZHANG F B, YANG M Y, WANG G Q, 2011. Using 7Be measurement to document contribution rate of sediment from different parts of cultivated runoff plots[J]. Journal of Sediment Research (1): 38-44. | |
[48] | 张光辉, 2020. 对土壤侵蚀研究的几点思考[J]. 水土保持学报, 34(4): 21-30. |
ZHANG G H, 2020. Several ideas related to soil erosion research[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(4): 21-30. | |
[49] | 张荣峰, 1991. 鄱阳湖水系泥沙特性及对环境的影响[J]. 江西水利科技 (3): 237-241. |
ZHANG R F, 1991. Sediment characteristics of Poyang Lake system and its impact on environment[J]. Jiangxi Hydraulic Science & Technology (3): 237-241. | |
[50] | 张晓明, 曹文洪, 周利军, 2014. 泥沙输移比及其尺度依存研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 34(24): 7475-7485. |
ZHANG X M, CAO W H, ZHOU L J, 2014. Progress review and discussion on sediment delivery ratio and its dependence on scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(24): 7475-7485. | |
[51] | 赵辉, 郭索彦, 解明曙, 等, 2011. 不同尺度流域日径流分形特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 22(1): 159-164. |
ZHAO H, GUO S Y, XIE M S, et al., 2011. Fractal characteristics of daily discharge in different scales watersheds[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(1): 159-164. | |
[52] | 赵鹏, 2014. 基于氢氧同位素示踪的紫色土坡耕地产流机制研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学. |
ZHAO P, 2014. The mechanism of runoff generation on the sloping farmland of purple soil based on hydrogen and oxygen isotopes tracing[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University. | |
[53] | 赵人俊, 1984. 流域水文模拟--新安江模型与陕北模型[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社. |
ZHAO R J, 1984. Watershed hydrological simulation: Xin’an Jiang model and Shaanbei model[M]. Beijing: Water Resources and Electric Power Press. | |
[54] |
赵文武, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 2002. 尺度推绎研究中的几点基本问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 17(6): 905-911.
DOI |
ZHAO W W, FU B J, CHEN L D, 2002. Some fundamental issues in scaling[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 17(6): 905-911. |
[1] | 李威闻, 黄金权, 齐瑜洁, 刘小岚, 刘纪根, 毛治超, 高绣纺. 土壤侵蚀条件下土壤微生物生物量碳含量变化及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 47-55. |
[2] | 郝贝贝, 王楠, 吴昊平, 周智鑫, 张思毅, 贺斌. 生态沟渠对珠三角稻田径流污染的削减功能研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1856-1864. |
[3] | 魏建兵, 郑泓, 程雨露, 王阳. 基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 835-844. |
[4] | 刘可慧, 李广娈, 李春明, 赵珂艺, 张宁宁, 薛洁怡, 李艺, 于方明, 段敏. 基于文献计量学和知识图谱分析的漓江生态环境40年研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 409-420. |
[5] | 石智宇, 王雅婷, 赵清, 张连蓬, 朱长明. 2001-2020年中国植被净初级生产力时空变化及其驱动机制分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2111-2123. |
[6] | 武照亮, 靳敏. 大气污染对中国居民社会经济行为影响的研究综述及问卷研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2251-2262. |
[7] | 孙晓杰, 邹怡, 郭晨辉. 基于CNKI数据库的植物与昆虫关系研究文献计量分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(1): 196-204. |
[8] | 孙雪娇, 李吉玫, 张毓涛, 李翔, 芦建江, 佘飞. 天山北坡山地森林林地产流产沙特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1821-1830. |
[9] | 陈步峰, 王莘仪, 肖以华, 吴巧花. 广州城市森林及不同地表垫面对暴雨径流与PAHs、TOC的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1865-1878. |
[10] | 陈步峰, 肖以华, 吴巧花. 广州市内与近郊林区暴雨及硬质地表径流PAHs质量负荷的差异特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1879-1887. |
[11] | 席辉辉, 吴丽新, 冯景秋, 殷根深. 中国大陆地区一种归化植物新记录——二十蕊商陆(Phytolacca icosandra L.)[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1555-1560. |
[12] | 徐志宇, 薛颖昊, 张军, 孙仁华, 石祖梁, 赫天一, 王久臣. 基于文献计量的秸秆综合利用研究热点与前沿分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6): 1310-1320. |
[13] | 李太魁, 张香凝, 寇长林, 吕金岭, 郭战玲, 骆晓声. 不同农艺措施对丹江口库区坡耕地茶园水土和磷素流失的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(12): 2324-2330. |
[14] | 卢乔倩, 江涛, 柳丹丽, 刘智勇. 中国不同植被覆盖类型NDVI对气温和降水的响应特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(1): 23-34. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||